Bank Hapoalim in the first quarter: the payout is still high, but the capital buffer is tighter
Bank Hapoalim distributed 50% of first-quarter profit even after earnings declined, but the report makes the payout a capital and funding question rather than a simple earnings question. Profitability is still strong, yet credit growth, the special tax and a lower NSFR leave less room for mistakes.
Bank Hapoalim entered 2026 as a bank that still returns a lot of capital to shareholders, but the first quarter shows that the real test is no longer whether quarterly profit is large enough to fund a distribution. Net profit fell to NIS 2.124 billion from NIS 2.424 billion in the comparable quarter, and the bank still approved a total distribution of about NIS 1.062 billion, equal to 50% of profit: an NIS 850 million cash dividend and an NIS 212 million buyback. That looks like a natural continuation of the high-payout policy, but the more important change sits underneath the headline number: the common equity Tier 1 ratio fell to 11.71%, risk-weighted assets grew, the NSFR fell to 113%, and the bank sharply increased debt and subordinated notes to support a balance sheet that is growing faster than its stable funding base. The special bank tax adds another 2026 headwind, with an estimated NIS 950 million hit to profit and a 1.3-1.4 percentage point hit to return on equity. The quarter does not undermine the bank's ability to distribute capital, but it makes the payout less free than it looks. In the next reports, the market is likely to focus less on the fact that profitability is still high and more on whether credit, funding, capital and credit costs can move together without forcing a narrower payout.
Company Snapshot
Bank Hapoalim is a large commercial bank, so its economic machine is not comparable to an industrial or real-estate company. There is no simple bridge from net income to free cash flow that tells us how much cash is available for distribution. For a bank, the payout is tested mainly through four layers: recurring profitability, risk-weighted assets, the common equity Tier 1 ratio and the stability of the funding base behind the loan book.
The bank ended the quarter with NIS 519.3 billion of credit to the public, up 3.3% from year-end 2025, and with NIS 602.8 billion of public deposits, up 1.7%. Bonds and subordinated notes reached NIS 43.0 billion, up 19.9%. That gap matters: credit is growing, but a larger part of the funding mix is coming through debt markets rather than deposits alone.
The broader first-quarter analysis already showed that profit declined while credit growth did not stop. This article takes a narrower angle: how comfortable the payout policy remains when the bank needs to fund credit growth, absorb a special tax and keep a buffer above its internal capital target.
The Payout Remains High, But It Now Depends On The Capital Buffer
The bank presents consistent distributions as a sign of confidence in profitability. In the first quarter, the board approved an NIS 850 million dividend and an NIS 212 million buyback, together equal to 50% of net profit. This is not a one-off. In the fourth quarter of 2025 the distribution reached 60% of profit, and in the second and third quarters of 2025 it stood at 50%.
The interesting point is not the dividend itself, but the buyback mechanism. The buyback plan approved in November 2025 is capped at NIS 1 billion and divided into stages. The second stage, approved together with the annual financial statements, was completed in April 2026 at a cost of about NIS 248 million. The third stage will begin after publication of the first-quarter report and is capped at NIS 212 million. The fourth stage, if approved after the second-quarter report, will again require a board decision.
That is where the condition separating routine payout from balance-sheet-sensitive payout appears. The board will not approve the next stage if the common equity Tier 1 ratio does not reflect an adequate buffer above the 11.0% internal target. In other words, the buyback is no longer just a capital-allocation decision. It becomes a quarterly test of how much capital is generated, how much capital is consumed by credit growth and how much buffer the board keeps before approving the next distribution.
Credit Is Growing, Funding Is Changing, And The Tax Narrows The Margin For Error
Quarterly profit remains high, but balance-sheet growth is consuming part of the generated capital. The common equity Tier 1 ratio was 11.71% at the end of March 2026, compared with 11.98% at year-end 2025. Risk-weighted assets rose to NIS 558.6 billion from NIS 539.2 billion at year-end, an increase of about NIS 19.4 billion. This is why profit alone is not enough to assess the capital return: every new shekel of credit that consumes risk-weighted assets competes with the dividend and the buyback for the same capital base.
Credit growth was fairly broad. Corporate credit rose 5.0% from the start of the year, commercial credit rose 4.6%, and housing loans rose 1.4%. On the earnings side, income from regular financing activity rose only slightly to NIS 4.492 billion despite a 13.7% increase in average credit balances. The report explains that credit growth was partly offset by lower credit spreads, lower interest rates and lower CPI-linkage income. That is an important signal: the balance sheet is growing faster than the improvement in regular financing income.
| Funding And Liquidity Metric | Year-End 2025 | End Of March 2026 | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public deposits | NIS 592.7 billion | NIS 602.8 billion | Up 1.7% |
| Bonds and subordinated notes | NIS 35.9 billion | NIS 43.0 billion | Up 19.9% |
| Liquidity coverage ratio, LCR | 130% | 128% | Still high, but slightly lower |
| Net stable funding ratio, NSFR | 116% | 113% | Above the requirement, but down in one quarter |
The bank has not been passive in sourcing funding. In the first quarter it raised about NIS 10.8 billion through bonds and subordinated notes, including a USD 2.0 billion international issuance. After the balance-sheet date it also raised another NIS 1.5 billion and approved full early redemption of Series Yud subordinated notes with principal of about NIS 1.25 billion. These steps are not negative by themselves, but they explain why the payout should be assessed together with the funding structure: the bank is distributing a lot, while also using the debt market to support balance-sheet growth and capital management.
The special tax on banks adds another layer to that test. The bank estimates a hit of about NIS 950 million to profit in 2026 and about NIS 40 million in 2027. The estimated effect on return on equity is about 1.3-1.4 percentage points. As a result, the 2026 net profit target was reduced to NIS 8.5-9.5 billion and the ROE target to 13%-14%. For 2027, the bank presents a net profit target of NIS 9.5-10.5 billion and an ROE target of 14%-15%.
This is not just a tax line. If first-quarter ROE was 13.0%, and the bank notes that excluding the annual effect of the special tax it would have been above 14%, the tax turns 2026 into a bridge year between strong underlying profitability and lower reported profit. A 50% distribution of quarterly profit still looks feasible, but it is less comfortable when reported profit is cut by an external charge and risk-weighted assets keep rising.
There is also a positive counterpoint in earnings quality: credit-loss expenses were only NIS 35 million in the quarter, compared with NIS 262 million in the comparable quarter. But this result is not fully clean either, because the individual net income included recoveries from a small number of borrowers. If later quarters return to higher credit provisions without a matching improvement in financing margins, the distribution buffer will become narrower.
Conclusion
Bank Hapoalim does not look like a bank that struggles to distribute capital. Profitability is still high, the loan book keeps growing, liquidity is above requirements, and the board continues to use both dividends and buybacks. But the first quarter makes the payout more sensitive to four variables: risk-weighted asset growth, funding sources, the special tax and normalized credit-loss expenses. A 0.71 percentage point buffer above the internal CET1 target is not stress, but it is also not wide enough to ignore bond-market volatility and continued balance-sheet growth.
The report notes that a 1% increase in the risk-free yield curve could reduce the capital reserve for available-for-sale securities by about NIS 1.6 billion after tax. That is not an immediate profit-and-loss loss, but it is a reminder that bank capital is exposed to market conditions as well. The right interpretation of the quarter is not that the payout is at risk. It is that the payout must be reproven every quarter. If the common equity Tier 1 ratio stays above the internal target after credit growth, if the NSFR stabilizes, and if credit-loss expenses do not return to a level that erases regular earnings strength, the high payout will look more sustainable. If one of those three conditions weakens, the bank can still remain very profitable, but the room between growth and shareholder capital return will become tighter.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.