From pipeline to execution: Which Donitz urban-renewal projects are actually close to turning into revenue
The main article identified the gap between sales activity, recognition, and cash. This follow-up shows that only a narrow slice of the urban-renewal reservoir, led by TRES Carol and then Beit Hakerem, has crossed enough gates to matter for revenue over the next few quarters.
What This Follow-up Is Isolating
The main article argued that Donitz's problem is not a lack of projects, but the conversion gap between marketing, permits, execution, revenue recognition, and cash. This follow-up narrows the question to the urban-renewal pipeline alone: not how many housing units sit in the headline number, but which projects have already crossed enough gates to become relevant to the income statement over the next few quarters.
The conclusion is sharp: out of a reservoir of about 27,000 units, only a narrow slice is actually close to turning into revenue. The investor deck breaks that reservoir into three quantitative layers: about 980 units in projects already under construction, about 3,150 units in projects whose construction is expected to start in 2026 and 2027, and about 8,750 units in projects whose construction is pushed out to 2028 and later. On top of that sits an even larger layer, about 14,000 units in 27 suspended urban-renewal projects and land plots at very early planning stages, which is not included at all in the gross-profit pool presented in the deck.
That chart is the core of the continuation thesis. The broad pipeline is real, but it is not uniform. If the question is what may turn into revenue in the near term, the 27,000-unit headline is not enough. The only useful read is to move layer by layer and ask where there is already marketing, where there is already a permit, where there is already evacuation, and where there is still only planning optionality.
The Top Layer: Projects Already Showing Real Conversion Evidence
The strongest signal in the annual report is not the total unit count, but the point where the company openly says commercial activity moved ahead of accounting recognition. During 2025 the company sold 262 units, and after the balance sheet date another 88 units plus 54 purchase requests. Of the 2025 sales, 189 units relate to TRES Carol and Maccabi Jaffa Phase B, projects where marketing has already begun but revenue has still not been recognized. After the balance sheet date, another 26 units in TRES Carol were also still outside recognized revenue.
That is the first filter. A project where apartments can already be sold but revenue still cannot yet be recognized has left the zone of pure potential and entered the zone of execution pressure. It is not yet contributing to reported earnings, but it is already pressing on timing.
TRES Carol: the clearest conversion signal in the file set
In TRES Carol, where the company's share is 33%, the current evidence package contains almost every milestone needed to talk about relatively near conversion. The deck presents a 359-unit project, of which 263 units are for sale, with 100% owner signings, a full building-permit decision subject to conditions, expected revenue of about ILS 278 million on the company's share, and expected gross profit of about ILS 57 million.
The February 2026 immediate report adds the milestone that really changes the read: after all conditions precedent in the agreement were satisfied, the company sent evacuation notices on February 25, 2026 to all rights holders, requiring possession to be delivered within 90 days. At that stage, 36 units had already been sold and purchase requests had been signed for another 12. In residential-development terms, this is no longer just a signatures story. It is a story about a project moving from accumulated rights into actual site clearance.
That is exactly why Carol sits at the top of the conversion ladder. Not because it is the biggest project, but because this file set already includes signings, a permit in conditions, active marketing, actual sales, and an evacuation notice. Even here, caution is still required: this is not immediate revenue. The evacuation still has to happen, execution still has to advance, and only then will the project begin to feed through the accounts.
Maccabi Jaffa Phase B: the commercial signal is there, but the physical evidence is thinner
The annual report also places Maccabi Jaffa Phase B in the "sold but not yet recognized" layer. That matters because it shows Carol is not a one-off case. But within this continuation evidence set there is no separate immediate filing for Maccabi Jaffa that shows an explicit move into evacuation or execution, the way Carol does. So Maccabi Jaffa belongs in the same commercial bucket, but with less operational certainty in the documents in hand.
That distinction matters. Not every project that has entered marketing sits at the same distance from revenue. The useful separation is between a project that already generates sales and a project that already generates execution events that shorten the path to recognition.
The Middle Layer: projects that have crossed a lot, but not yet the final gate
Beit Hakerem: economically larger, operationally still one step behind
Beit Hakerem, or HaArazim in Jerusalem, is economically even more meaningful than Carol. The deck presents a 401-unit project, of which 247 units are for sale, with a 50% company share, expected revenue of about ILS 479 million, and expected gross profit of about ILS 94 million. In addition, about ILS 75 million of expected gross profit on the company's share is still not included in equity. This is already a project that can move reported numbers, not just improve the visual story.
Operationally, there is also clear progress. The deck says that in August 2025 the local committee approved a full building permit in conditions for 401 units. In the March 2026 immediate filing, the company said the evacuation-and-redevelopment agreement had been signed by all rights holders in the land, in a way that allows the company, subject to entering into a financing agreement, to evacuate all apartments and continue advancing the project. At the same time, it states that the Jerusalem municipality's signature, tied to one apartment in the project, still requires Interior Ministry approval, although the company says it has already reached understandings with the municipality that allow it to keep moving in parallel.
This is exactly the kind of project that sits one rung below Carol. Its economics are bigger, but the key sentence in the filing is still "subject to entering into a financing agreement." In other words, it is very close, but it has not yet crossed the practical financing-and-evacuation gate. That is not semantics. It is the difference between a project that can be measured against a shorter timetable and a project that still needs one more material operational approval.
That chart helps explain why size alone is not enough. Beit Hakerem is larger than Carol on almost every central economic measure, but Carol is closer to the stage where real conversion can begin to be expected, because it has already moved from a planning milestone into an evacuation milestone.
Haifa and Givatayim: highly advanced, but without an immediate delivery signal in this set
The deck also points to another middle layer. In Haifa, owner signings stand at 100%, 100%, and 97% across the three compounds, and as early as November 2024 the local committee had already granted demolition, shoring, excavation, and full building permits in conditions for all compounds. In Givatayim, signings stand at 100%, and in July 2025 a full building permit in conditions was approved for Phase A. These are no longer theoretical projects.
But in both cases, at least within the evidence set used for this continuation, the short-term signal that now exists in Carol, or almost exists in Beit Hakerem, is still missing: an evacuation notice, a signed finance package, or a clear indication that the project has moved from permit and planning into an execution event that can be tracked over the next few quarters. That is why they belong to the middle layer rather than the top one.
A short conversion map
| Project | What is already in hand | What is still missing | What it means for the next 2 to 4 quarters |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRES Carol | 100% signings, permit in conditions, evacuation notices, 36 units sold and 12 purchase requests | Actual evacuation and execution progress that can support revenue recognition | This is the clearest signal that the pipeline is really moving |
| Maccabi Jaffa Phase B | Sales already sit inside the layer of units sold but not yet recognized as revenue | In this evidence set there is no parallel operating event like Carol's | Commercially the project is already alive, but operational visibility is still partial |
| Beit Hakerem | 100% signings, permit in conditions, all rights holders signed and the company can advance toward evacuation subject to finance | A signed financing agreement and continued handling of the municipality apartment approval | Economically this is a heavyweight project, but it is still not the closest to revenue |
| Haifa | Near-complete signings across all compounds and demolition, shoring, excavation, and building permits in conditions | The chosen filings do not yet show a short-term execution signal such as evacuation or a reported marketing acceleration | Advanced, but still not at the very top of the conversion queue |
What still has to stay outside the near-term revenue calculation
Discipline matters here. The fact that Donitz has about 27,000 units in its overall pipeline does not make all of them equally relevant to 2026 and 2027. The annual report itself already compresses the screen: 18 projects with approved plans represent about 8,500 units, 10 projects in advanced planning add about 4,400 units, and only about 3,000 units have already received building permits or committee decisions. At the same time, 24 suspended urban-renewal projects and another 3 early-stage land positions together represent about 14,000 units, including about 3,000 existing units slated for evacuation.
The analytical meaning is simple: the big pipeline headline is a value reservoir, not a revenue schedule. Even within the layer that has already entered the economic presentation, a large share of projects is meant to start construction only from 2028 onward. So the right question for the next few quarters is not how many units the company has, but how many units have already crossed enough gates to shorten the path to revenue.
That is also why the market can get the story wrong in both directions. One mistake is to look at 27,000 units and assume conversion is only a matter of time. The opposite mistake is to look at the current report and miss the fact that there is already a layer of projects that has moved beyond signatures. The correct read sits in the middle: the reservoir is real, but the near-term conversion layer is much narrower.
Bottom Line
If urban renewal is isolated on its own, Donitz does not look like a company that lacks pipeline. It looks like a company that still has to prove the pipeline can compress into projects that can actually be executed. As of the end of the first quarter of 2026, the strongest conversion signal is TRES Carol, because it already links signings, permit status, marketing, and an evacuation notice. Beit Hakerem sits right behind it: economically larger, but still with a financing and approval gate that must be closed. After them there is a real layer of advanced projects, such as Haifa and Givatayim, but that layer still does not offer the same degree of short-term proof.
That is the thesis of this follow-up: in Donitz, the urban-renewal reservoir is not the problem. The problem is that only a small part of it has already crossed enough stages to matter for revenue over the next 2 to 4 quarters. A reader who values the company through the biggest unit-count headline will miss the bottleneck. A reader who values it through Carol, Beit Hakerem, and the thin layer just below them will get a much cleaner screen of what can actually move now.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.