Amidar in the First Quarter: Senior Housing Grows, and Depreciation Softens the Profit Erosion
Amidar kept first-quarter net profit at NIS 9.9 million, but segment performance weakened and senior housing moved from profit to loss. A depreciation-estimate change reduced quarterly expenses by NIS 1.7 million, making reported profit look steadier than the underlying operating result.
Amidar opened 2026 with a bottom line that looks stable, but the quarter did not deliver the proof investors needed after 2025. Revenue was NIS 111.2 million, almost unchanged year over year, and net profit edged up to NIS 9.9 million. Beneath that, operating profit fell to NIS 10.3 million and total segment profit fell 21.8%, mainly because senior housing grew revenue but moved into a segment loss. The decline in profit looks milder because a revised useful-life estimate for company-owned original housing assets reduced depreciation expense by about NIS 1.7 million in the quarter. This does not make the credit read weak: the state-linked debt mechanism continues to function, debt is being repaid on schedule, and the company still has a broad layer of cash and investments. But on business quality, the key proof point remains open: senior housing expansion is still adding turnover before it proves profitability. Over the next few quarters, the read depends on whether the Northern Cluster starts moving toward segment profit, whether the maintenance fund translates into actual works without eroding flexible liquidity, and whether the Kiryat Shmona project turns from a revenue headline into a binding contract with a clear economic contribution.
Amidar Is a State Management Platform, Not a Normal Income Real Estate Company
The easy mistake is to read the company like a conventional income-producing real estate company. It manages state assets, collects and transfers money to the state, receives fees and management income, and also holds some original assets of its own. At the end of March 2026, the company managed 43,332 assets, including about 34,000 permanent public-housing units, about 4,000 Development Authority assets, 59 senior housing buildings with about 5,250 units, and about 50 investment properties.
That structure changes the economics. Profit is not just a function of occupancy, rent, or asset value. Most revenue comes from the State of Israel, which is also the controlling shareholder, and the agreements with the state determine what the company receives, what it passes through, and what remains as surplus. This is why the report matters less as an equity-market read and more as a credit and execution-quality read: does a larger government activity base leave operating profit, cash flow, and flexibility, or mainly increase turnover and earmarked obligations?
That frame also explains why net profit alone is the wrong measure. In the first quarter, net profit barely moved, but the segments tell a different story. Permanent housing still holds most of the revenue base, the Development Authority and investment real estate improved their contribution, and senior housing is where the main 2026 promise is being tested.
Senior Housing Is Still Adding Turnover More Than Profit
Senior housing was the key follow-up checkpoint after the analysis of the Northern Cluster. In 2025 the company absorbed that cluster in mid-June, so there was a fair counterargument: the year included a partial integration period, and fuller quarters could show improvement. The first quarter still does not show that improvement.
Senior housing revenue rose to NIS 14.8 million from NIS 10.9 million in the comparable quarter, an increase of 35.8%. But the segment moved from a NIS 2.4 million profit to a NIS 1.3 million loss. That shift is sharper than the revenue movement, and it came alongside a jump in subcontractor costs for senior housing management to NIS 9.4 million from NIS 4.8 million. Segment employee costs also rose to NIS 1.4 million from NIS 0.8 million.
The comparison is not perfect, because the comparable quarter did not include the Northern Cluster in the current format. That is exactly why it matters: the first quarter of 2026 should begin to show whether the addition is approaching a reasonable economic structure. For now, it increases revenue but not profit. This does not prove a structural failure, but it does prove that the claim that 2025 was merely an integration year still needs better numbers.
The rest of the activity base is calmer. The Development Authority activity increased revenue to NIS 8.5 million and segment profit to NIS 3.0 million, while investment real estate contributed NIS 2.1 million of segment profit. Permanent housing revenue slipped to NIS 81.6 million, mainly because of lower Ministry-funded maintenance work, but its segment profit remained almost stable at NIS 5.8 million. The problem is not broad business deterioration. It is a sharp shift in one segment that now carries the quality-of-growth question.
Reported Profit Got Help From Lower Depreciation
Operating profit fell from NIS 11.7 million to NIS 10.3 million, down 12.1%. That decline looks limited, but it needs to be separated into layers. Total segment profit fell from NIS 14.6 million to NIS 11.4 million, a decline of NIS 3.2 million. What softened the hit to the income statement was lower unallocated depreciation, which fell from NIS 2.9 million to NIS 1.1 million.
The reason is an important accounting event: the company reassessed the useful life of company-owned original housing assets and revised depreciation rates from the beginning of 2026. The change reduced quarterly depreciation expense by about NIS 1.7 million. It is a legitimate adjustment and is based on an external expert opinion, but it is not cash and it is not an operating improvement. Without that effect, the operating-profit decline would have been sharper.
Net profit was also supported by items below operating profit. Net finance income increased to NIS 2.6 million from NIS 1.9 million, and tax expense fell to NIS 2.9 million from NIS 3.9 million. So the NIS 9.9 million net profit is not weak, but it is also not proof that the activity base improved. It mainly shows that the bottom line absorbed segment erosion with the help of lower depreciation, finance income, and tax.
Liquidity remains orderly, but not free. Cash flow from operating activities was negative NIS 29.8 million, compared with negative NIS 36.3 million in the comparable quarter. On an all-in cash flexibility basis after actual cash uses, the company received NIS 50 million from the state-debt asset for bond principal repayment, repaid NIS 50 million of bond principal, and paid NIS 2.8 million of lease liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents together with the maintenance-fund deposit fell by NIS 23.8 million to NIS 227.2 million. At the same time, other payables declined by NIS 15.8 million, mainly because about NIS 11.7 million of maintenance work was performed. That is progress against maintenance obligations, but it also underlines that not all liquidity should be read as unrestricted cash.
Conclusions
The first quarter leaves the company in an in-between zone: debt continues to behave predictably, liquidity is comfortable relative to the repayment schedule, and net profit did not break, but senior housing still has not proved the economics of the expansion. The Government Companies Authority’s May 19, 2026 approval to earmark NIS 27.2 million of profit for the maintenance fund will strengthen the earmarked-cash layer in the second quarter and narrow the gap between accounting profit and freely usable cash.
Two post-balance-sheet events sharpen the follow-up. The Kiryat Shmona Ministry of Defense project has an estimated works scope of about NIS 120 million over roughly 36 months, but the company states that its annual net management fees are not material and that no binding agreement has been signed. About 700 public-housing apartments were also damaged during Operation Roaring Lion, with no material effect identified as of report approval.
The quarter does not weaken the credit read, but it does weaken the optimistic operating read. For 2026 to look like an improvement year rather than just a larger activity year, senior housing needs to reduce its loss, operating profit needs to improve without similar accounting support, and operating cash flow needs to depend less on timing with government bodies. The counter-thesis remains strong because this is a government company with an orderly debt mechanism, high ratings, and essential activity, but stable net profit will not prove value creation if the fastest-growing segment keeps losing money.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.