Rani Zim in the First Quarter: NOI Is Rising, but Cash Still Depends on Occupancy and Refinancing
Rani Zim opened 2026 with positive profit, higher NOI and positive FFO, but the quarter still does not prove the portfolio can fund itself. Kfar Saba moved into initial occupancy and Rahat is already producing NOI, yet the dividend, investment spend and refinancing needs keep the thesis tied to rapid asset maturation and funding access.
Rani Zim no longer looks like the company that ended 2025 mainly with a refinancing story and assets that still needed to mature. The first quarter gives the first real evidence that the new assets are entering the numbers: NOI rose by 15.5%, FFO under the Securities Authority approach attributable to shareholders moved from negative territory to NIS 5.6 million, and lower finance costs brought the company back to a small net profit. Still, this is more of a transition quarter than a full proof quarter. Same-property NOI rose by only 2%, most of the improvement came from added assets, and operating cash flow still does not cover the investment pace before new financing. Kfar Saba received an occupancy certificate and a meaningful lease was signed after the balance-sheet date, but the marketing rate of the inventory portion is still around 30%, so the asset still needs to move from construction and occupancy into clearer cash generation. After a NIS 30 million dividend paid in April, liquidity becomes a nearer-term question: not whether the assets carry value, but how quickly that value can turn into NOI, realizations and cash flow that does not depend on fresh financing every quarter.
NOI Is Rising, but the Run Rate Still Has to Catch the 2026 Plan
Rani Zim is not a retail story. It is income-producing real estate with a development and betterment layer: the company invests in construction, raises occupancy and rent, records part of the value through fair value, and then needs to convert that into cheaper financing, NOI and cash flow. After the previous annual analysis, where the 2025 refinancing bought time but did not solve the cash layer, the most positive number in the quarter is not the NIS 1.2 million net profit. It is the NOI improvement. Rental and property-management revenue rose to NIS 38.8 million, compared with NIS 33.6 million in the corresponding quarter, an increase of about 15.4%. The company attributes the increase mainly to the activation of the new Rahat and Tamra assets and to roughly 4% growth in same-property revenue.
The NOI breakdown cools the initial enthusiasm. Total NOI rose to NIS 28.7 million, compared with NIS 24.9 million in the corresponding quarter, but NOI from existing properties rose only to NIS 25.3 million, an increase of about 2%. In other words, most of the jump came from a NIS 3.4 million contribution from properties acquired or activated during the period, not from a broad step-up across the older portfolio.
The gap versus 2026 guidance is where the quarter turns from a positive sign into an open question. The company presents 2026 guidance of NIS 150 million in NOI from existing properties and NIS 44.7 million in after-tax management-method FFO. A quarter with NIS 28.7 million of NOI and NIS 6.8 million of management-method FFO does not contradict the guidance, but it requires clear acceleration over the next three quarters. To reach NIS 150 million of annual NOI, the average quarterly NOI for the rest of the year must be materially higher than the first-quarter level.
That does not mean the guidance is unreasonable. It means the guidance depends on a transition year in which new assets need to mature quickly, projects need to begin contributing, and the company needs to prove that the improvement is not only a function of asset openings but also of stabilized occupancy, rent and operations.
Kfar Saba Moved Into Occupancy, but Has Not Yet Become Accessible Cash
Kfar Saba changes the reading of the quarter more than any income-statement line. On March 26, 2026, the Zim Urban Kfar Saba commercial center and data-center facility received an occupancy certificate and entered initial occupancy. After the balance-sheet date, a lease was signed with an unrelated third party for about 9,001 square meters of logistics space and about 2,985 square meters of commercial space, for a period of at least 30 months. The tenant also received a 24-month right to purchase the logistics space only.
That is real business progress because it replaces part of the earlier future-realization story with commercial action. It is still not equivalent to a sale, collection or full realization. In the LOGIX table, the group’s share in the project is 50%, the financial completion rate excluding land reached 99%, and cumulative cost for the group’s share stood at NIS 223.1 million. But in the inventory portion of the project, cumulative marketing stood at only 29.87% at quarter-end, and the company still presents 23,900 square meters without binding contracts.
| Kfar Saba Checkpoint | What Has Happened | What Still Has to Be Proven |
|---|---|---|
| Execution completion | 99% financial completion excluding land | Move from initial occupancy to full operation |
| Cumulative contracts in the inventory portion | Expected revenue from signed contracts of NIS 130.3 million | Large remaining area without binding contracts |
| Marketing rate | 29.87% at quarter-end | Marketing or realization of the remaining space |
| Post-balance-sheet event | Lease of 9,001 sqm logistics and 2,985 sqm commercial space | Whether the purchase right becomes a sale and cash |
The unusual point is not that a real estate project advances in stages. That is normal for the sector. The unusual point is the gap between the advanced execution stage and the marketing and cash stage. Once construction is nearly complete, each additional quarter without broader conversion into contracts, sale proceeds or cash flow makes Kfar Saba less of a project under construction and more of an asset that must justify the capital already invested in it.
Cash Flow Improved Before Investments, Then Financing Returned to the Center
Operating cash flow was NIS 14.8 million in the first quarter, compared with negative operating cash flow of NIS 27.3 million in the corresponding quarter. That is a real improvement, mainly because the comparable quarter was pressured by working capital, while this quarter benefited from movement in customers, receivables and payables.
But under an all-in cash-flexibility view after the actual cash uses of the period, the picture is less comfortable. Operating cash flow did not cover the NIS 72.5 million negative investment cash flow, which mainly reflected investment in investment property, investment property under development and fixed assets. Before financing activity, the company therefore had a cash deficit of about NIS 57.7 million. The NIS 6.1 million increase in cash by quarter-end was possible only after positive financing cash flow of NIS 63.8 million.
| Cash-Flow Component in the Quarter | NIS Million | Economic Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 14.8 | Improvement versus a weak comparable quarter |
| Investment cash flow | -72.5 | Investments still exceed operating cash generation |
| Gap before financing | -57.7 | The activity did not fund the investment pace |
| Financing cash flow | 63.8 | New financing closed the period’s gap |
| Declared dividend | -30.0 | Paid in April, reducing post-quarter liquidity |
This is where the two cash readings need to be separated. On recurring cash generation, the quarter is much better than the corresponding quarter: cash flow is positive and FFO is positive. On cash flexibility after investments, debt and dividend, the company still needs financing, credit lines and realizations. That is not abnormal for an income-producing real estate company still in an investment and maturation phase, but it means the quarter does not remove the liquidity question.
The balance sheet explains why the market will keep watching financing. As of March 31, 2026, the company had net liquid assets of about NIS 19 million, short-term bank liabilities of about NIS 218 million, long-term bank liabilities of about NIS 367 million, and book bond debt of about NIS 1.519 billion. The liquidity note shows a working-capital deficit of about NIS 64 million. It also states that near the approval date of the financial statements the company had about NIS 5 million of liquid balances and about NIS 110 million of approved, undrawn bank credit lines. That is enough for management to frame the company as liquid, but it is not a picture in which cash has stopped being a bottleneck.
Asset Value Still Depends on Occupancy, Not Only Cap Rates
A quarter with only NIS 1.6 million of investment-property revaluation gain is not a dramatic fair-value quarter. That is partly positive: the small net profit was not built on an unusual accounting jump, and the move back to profit came mainly from operations and lower finance costs. At the same time, the asset base still includes a lot of value that must be supported by recurring NOI.
Rahat is a useful example. The attached valuation presents an active center with 93% occupancy, average rent of NIS 89 per square meter and a fair value of NIS 148.2 million as of the valuation date, compared with NIS 134.9 million in the valuation as of March 31, 2025. The improvement is supported by fuller operation of the center and actual operating data, but the valuation still deducts grace periods and tenant discounts. Rahat has already moved beyond the asset-under-construction stage, but the quality of its NOI will still be tested through collection and recurring rent, not only through value.
There is no sharp covenant warning in the quarter. The company complies with the financial covenants of its bond series, net financial debt to net CAP is 63%, and equity levels are far above the minimum thresholds. But Series C still carries an interpretation note: EBITDA to interest is 2.61 under the company’s calculation, while under the Israel Securities Authority’s position it is 1.05. That gap does not change the quarter by itself, but it is a reminder that the company’s financing story depends not only on the numbers, but also on confidence in how they are calculated.
There is also one unresolved valuation point. For Al-Bawadi, the company updates that the ISA staff review of the valuation has not yet been completed, and that an additional appraiser has not yet completed the work. That does not mean the valuation is wrong, but it leaves part of the valuation layer under review. In a company where equity, covenants and financing access rely on asset values, even this interim note is not just noise.
Conclusions
The first quarter improves the read on Rani Zim, but it does not yet turn the company into a mature income-producing real estate platform that funds itself through operating cash flow. NOI and FFO moved in the right direction, finance costs fell, and Kfar Saba reached an important business milestone. Against that, the current NOI run rate is still below what is needed for the 2026 outlook, investment cash outflow is larger than operating cash flow, and the dividend paid after the balance-sheet date reduces the cash cushion in a year that still requires asset maturation.
The current conclusion is that Q1 strengthens the stabilization thesis, but not yet the financial-flexibility thesis. The read will improve if the next three quarters show a clear rise in NOI from new assets, continued reduction in finance costs, progress in marketing or realizing Kfar Saba, and preserved liquidity without renewed covenant tension. It will weaken if Kfar Saba remains mainly a partially leased asset rather than a cash source, if FFO does not approach the annual pace the company presents, or if valuation and financing questions bring attention back from operations to the balance sheet.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.