Sugat in the First Quarter: Margins Improved, but Cash Is Already Earmarked for the Dividend and Philtona
Sugat opened 2026 with almost flat revenue but a clear improvement in profitability, mainly from retail, lower raw-material costs, and lower shipping costs. The operating improvement is real, but the dividend, Philtona acquisition, Dvir project, and possible additional deal make the next few quarters a capital-allocation test, not only a sales test.
Sugat answered one question in the first quarter of 2026 and reopened another. The core business looks stronger: revenue rose only 0.5%, but gross profit jumped 15.0%, operating profit rose 24.1%, and net finance expense fell from NIS 9.6 million to NIS 1.4 million. This was not a quarter of volume-led growth alone. The sales mix, lower raw-material and shipping costs, and the post-IPO debt reduction all reached the profit line. Still, the quarter does not solve the main friction: operating cash flow was NIS 18.8 million, but after investments, lease payments, short-term credit repayment, and land betterment tax related to the Israel Land Authority settlement, cash fell by NIS 14.4 million before the NIS 51 million dividend paid in April. The Philtona acquisition has not yet closed, Dvir is already consuming CAPEX, and the non-binding principles document for another deal keeps a much larger capital-allocation option on the table. The quarter strengthens the quality of the core business, but it also says margin improvement must turn into free cash quickly if the company wants to preserve the flexibility created by the IPO.
Profitability Improved Even Though Revenue Barely Moved
The company is a food producer, importer, and distributor serving the Israeli market, with two operating engines: retail, which mainly sells to chains, wholesalers, and retailers, and industrial, which serves food manufacturers, institutions, food-service customers, and export markets. In this model, revenue alone can mislead. Lower sugar prices can reduce sales without hurting profitability because the activity is hedged, while the same move can still affect working capital through inventory, customers, and suppliers.
The first quarter shows that gap clearly. Revenue was NIS 254.1 million, compared with NIS 252.8 million in the prior-year quarter, up only 0.5%. Gross profit rose to NIS 57.8 million, and gross margin was 22.7% versus 19.9% a year earlier. Operating profit reached NIS 25.7 million versus NIS 20.7 million, and net profit rose to NIS 19.0 million versus NIS 9.2 million. The lower finance burden after most debt was repaid with the December 2025 IPO proceeds is a major part of the change: net finance expense fell by NIS 8.2 million year over year.
Most of the incremental contribution came from retail. Segment revenue rose to NIS 186.4 million, up 4.8%, and contribution rose to NIS 61.4 million, up 17.9%. Industrial was different: revenue fell to NIS 67.7 million, down 9.6%, mainly because sugar prices continued to decline, and contribution fell to NIS 19.2 million. The quarter therefore does not prove broad acceleration across the entire business. It proves better quality in retail, while industrial is still exposed to sugar-price movement and a comparison base that is not detached from commodity volatility.
The Adjusted Metric Is Strong, Reported Cash Flow Is More Cautious
Management presents adjusted EBITDA of NIS 36.6 million for the quarter, up 22% year over year, and net operating cash flow of NIS 30.4 million, up 16%. These are good figures, but they do not measure all of the quarter’s real cash uses. That metric deducts normative CAPEX of NIS 3.1 million and excludes Dvir investments because the expected EBITDA improvement from the move is not included in the 2026 budget. That is a legitimate adjustment for showing operating earnings power, but it is not a substitute for cash after investments, debt, and leases.
In reported cash flow, profit and non-working-capital adjustments reached roughly NIS 34.7 million. Working-capital changes consumed NIS 15.9 million, mainly because customers increased by NIS 37.9 million, partly offset by an NIS 18.2 million inventory decline. The final result was operating cash flow of NIS 18.8 million, a clear improvement from negative NIS 10.4 million in the prior-year quarter, but still not enough on its own to cover all cash uses for the period.
All-in cash flexibility after the quarter’s actual cash uses was weaker than the adjusted metric. Operating activity brought in NIS 18.8 million, but investing activity consumed NIS 20.6 million, including NIS 13.1 million of property and equipment, of which roughly NIS 4 million was invested in Dvir, and NIS 7.6 million of land betterment tax related to the Israel Land Authority settlement. Financing activity consumed another NIS 12.1 million, mainly short-term credit repayment and NIS 6.4 million of lease payments. Before the dividend paid after the balance-sheet date, cash had already fallen from NIS 103.1 million to NIS 88.7 million.
Philtona, Dvir, and the Dividend Come Before Free Cash Builds
The important point in the quarter is not only earnings quality. It is the pace at which the company is already distributing and allocating capital. The board declared a NIS 51 million dividend in March, paid on April 6, 2026. Against NIS 88.7 million of cash at the end of March, that is a material distribution. On a static calculation alone, the payment reduces cash to roughly NIS 37.7 million before any post-balance-sheet operating activity.
At the same time, the Philtona acquisition is still waiting for all closing conditions to be satisfied. The Competition Commissioner’s approval has already been received, but the deal had not closed as of the financial-statement approval date. The agreed consideration is NIS 55 million, with most of the amount to be paid in cash and the remainder through a dividend Philtona will distribute before closing. This does not create immediate liquidity pressure, but it does show that the net cash position at the end of 2025 is not fully available for additional acquisitions.
The non-binding principles document for another acquisition makes the issue sharper. The company is examining an acquisition of control in a local food company with estimated 2025 annual sales of NIS 250-300 million and EBITDA of NIS 30-40 million, at a 100% valuation of NIS 200-300 million. Part of the consideration is expected to be paid at closing and part subject to future performance, but even a staged structure can move the balance sheet back to a point where funding determines the pace of growth. Dvir adds another layer: property and equipment already rose by NIS 9.3 million from the end of 2025, partly because of project investments and truck purchases, and the project is still not expected to contribute to EBITDA in the 2026 budget.
The ownership event also changes the stock’s profile. Fortissimo sold 20.5 million shares to institutional investors in May, fell to a 19.44% stake, and ceased to be the controlling shareholder, while remaining the largest shareholder. That may improve market float and shareholder distribution, but it does not change the operating question: can the company keep acquiring and distributing cash at a pace the core business can fund?
What the Market May Miss in the Next Few Quarters
The easy number to read is the increase in profit. The more important number is the source of that increase. In this quarter, revenue barely grew, but retail earned more from each shekel of sales, debt no longer swallowed much of the improvement, and lower raw-material and shipping costs helped margins. That is a positive signal for the business quality, but not proof that the full year will run at the same pace. The first quarter is affected by seasonality around Jewish holidays, and the company says customer balances rose mainly because of Passover timing and changed trade terms with several customers.
The external risk layer is not yet visible in the income statement, but it exists in working capital. The company does not identify a material actual effect from Operation Roaring Lion and related geopolitical developments on first-quarter results, and sugar hedging should protect operating profitability. The part that can still move is working-capital need: fuel, shipping, fertilizer, and sugar prices can increase inventory or credit needs even when profitability is hedged.
The core business looks better after stripping out the one-off Israel Land Authority gain, and the first quarter provided initial proof that the company can earn more even without a sharp increase in sales. But 2026 is a capital-allocation year: the dividend has already been paid, Philtona is still pending, Dvir is consuming investment, and another possible transaction sits above the balance sheet. For the profit improvement to get a steadier market reading, operating cash flow needs to cover real CAPEX, leases, dividends, and acquisitions without quickly returning the balance sheet to a tighter position.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.