Skip to main content
ByMay 28, 2026~7 min read

TGI in the First Quarter: Cash Flow Worked, Dividends and Spain Raise the Proof Bar

TGI opened 2026 with strong operating cash flow, a comfortable balance sheet, and another dividend. But Lordan grew mainly through U.S. sales while segment profit fell, and Spain still has to move from capacity story to visible production and sales.

CompanyTGI

TGI opened 2026 better than the headline operating profit suggests, but less cleanly than the dividend story can make it look. Continuing operations generated NIS 10.2 million of operating cash flow in the first quarter, bank debt declined, covenant headroom remains wide, and Tamhash continues to serve as the group’s stable profit anchor. Still, the quarter does not close the main questions left after 2025: Lordan sold more, mainly to U.S. customers, but its segment profit fell sharply because the comparable quarter benefited from Swords of Iron compensation, and Spain is still mostly a capacity promise rather than accounting proof of a new profit stream. The dividend is not a sign of weakness, but it changes the lens: after capex, debt repayment, leases, and dividends to minority holders, cash barely increased during the quarter, while another NIS 8 million of shareholder dividends was declared or paid around quarter-end. The current read is therefore cautiously positive: the company is no longer a balance-sheet stress story, but an industrial group that still has to prove that profit, cash flow, and distributions can all hold together while Lordan works through the U.S., tariffs, and Spain.

The Quarter Confirms Cash Flow, Not the Whole Story

The group now operates through two industrial legs. Tamhash manufactures and markets electrical cabinets and metal products, mainly for Israel’s construction and infrastructure markets. Lordan, in which the company holds 55%, manufactures heat exchangers and cooling and heating systems, with activity in Israel, England, and Spain. After the magnesium casting activity at Ortal was discontinued, the economic debate is no longer about the old fire damage. It is about whether the two new legs are strong enough to fund investments, debt service, and regular distributions.

In the 2025 annual analysis, the open question was whether Lordan and Spain would begin to ease the operating bottleneck while Tamhash held group profitability. The first quarter gives only a partial answer. Revenue rose to NIS 44.5 million, up 3.5% year over year, and profit attributable to shareholders rose to NIS 5.93 million from NIS 5.49 million. But operating profit fell to NIS 8.17 million from NIS 8.75 million, while the increase in shareholder profit also reflected lower finance expenses and a smaller share of profit allocated to minorities.

That gap matters because it separates three layers. The business is generating cash. The balance sheet is comfortable. But Lordan has not yet shown that the investments in England and Spain have changed the group’s economics, and the dividend makes the cash question sharper: not whether there is cash at quarter-end, but how much remains available after the cash uses that have already been decided.

Tamhash Held Profit, Lordan’s Growth Was Lower Quality

Tamhash delivered the cleaner part of the quarter. Revenue was almost flat, at NIS 22.7 million versus NIS 22.6 million, but segment profit rose to NIS 6.2 million from NIS 5.4 million. The business explanation is relatively straightforward: lower raw-material prices, lower maintenance expenses, and insurance income related to fixed assets. This is not a growth breakout, but it is an industrial leg that continues to hold a high profitability level.

Lordan was the opposite. Revenue rose to NIS 21.9 million from NIS 20.5 million, mainly due to higher sales to U.S. customers. But segment profit fell to NIS 3.1 million from NIS 4.7 million. A large part of the gap comes from the fact that the comparable quarter included Swords of Iron compensation, so the decline should not be read simply as operating deterioration. Still, that is exactly why the quarter does not yet prove a quality shift at Lordan: sales growth arrived, but it was not enough to preserve segment profit against a comparison base helped by compensation.

Profit Stayed With Tamhash, Lordan’s Sales Growth Has Not Yet Carried Profit

U.S. sales are now a double trigger. They helped Lordan grow during the quarter, and the U.S. already accounts for roughly 12% of group revenue through Lordan. At the same time, U.S. tariff policy remains unstable, and the tariff on Israeli exports to the U.S. stands around 15% as of the filing date, with management examining alternatives to reduce the effective tariff rate. This is not yet a proven hit to profit, but it is a new friction point on the quarter’s clearest growth source.

Cash Was Generated, but Distributions Are Already Taking Part of the Surplus

The strongest number in the quarter is operating cash flow. Continuing operations generated NIS 10.2 million, compared with NIS 8.9 million in the comparable quarter. Even after discontinued operations, operating cash flow was still close to NIS 9.9 million. That happened despite a NIS 4.9 million increase in trade receivables, because inventory declined by NIS 2.4 million and suppliers and payables supported cash flow.

But the frame matters. Here the relevant frame is all-in cash flexibility after the quarter’s actual cash uses: operating cash flow, discontinued operations, capex, insurance proceeds received, debt, leases, and dividends to minority holders. In that frame, the quarter ended with only a NIS 0.3 million increase in cash, to NIS 23.8 million. That is not liquidity stress, but it is also not a large freely available surplus.

First-quarter cash layerNIS millionMeaning
Operating cash flow from continuing operations10.2Core business generated cash
Discontinued operations-0.3Ortal still consumed a small amount of cash
Net investment activity-2.6Mainly fixed assets, net of insurance proceeds
Net financing activity-7.0Debt repayments, lease principal, and minority dividends, after new loans
Net change in cash0.3Cash barely increased

This distinction is especially important because of the payout. Lordan distributed a NIS 4.5 million dividend in February 2026, of which the company’s share was about NIS 2.5 million. In March, the company approved a NIS 4 million dividend to its own shareholders, paid on April 28, 2026. On May 27, 2026, it approved another NIS 4 million dividend to be paid on June 22, 2026. In the investor presentation, management presents a policy of distributing at least 50% of net profit and a 7.5% dividend yield based on the last four quarters, including the June distribution.

The positive side is that the company is not doing this from a stretched balance sheet. Cash stood at NIS 23.8 million, total bank credit declined to NIS 39.8 million from NIS 43.6 million at the end of 2025, the equity-to-assets ratio remained around 62%, and the group is comfortably compliant with its financial covenants. Lordan itself also looks far from credit pressure: it has no net financial debt, tangible equity of about NIS 70 million against a NIS 19 million requirement, and Lordan UK has a 41% LTV ratio versus an 80% ceiling.

Still, that policy raises the proof bar. As long as Spain still requires investment before a visible contribution, and as long as Lordan has not proven that sales growth can also return to segment profit without one-off compensation, the dividend is not only a shareholder reward. It is also a cash use competing with the same pool that funds the expansion.

Spain Remains the Next Trigger, Not This Quarter’s Proof

The presentation keeps Spain at the center of the 2026 story: Lordan Iberian Coils, in which Lordan holds 65%, the purchase of 19.9% of Sereva with an option to increase the holding to 65%, and investments in England to increase production and overseas sales. The industrial logic is clear, because Lordan sells a customized engineering product and customer approvals take time. Proximity to European customers can improve availability and service.

But in the first quarter, Spain is still not visible as an independent earnings engine. Revenue grew mainly through the U.S., and Lordan’s profit declined. Q2 and Q3 2026 therefore matter more than Q1: they should begin to show whether the capacity investment is becoming production, orders, and margins.

The company entered 2026 from a position of balance-sheet strength, but not yet from a position of full operating proof. If Spain and England begin shortening delivery times and rebuilding profitable sales backlog, the dividend will look like surplus distribution from a stabilized company. If Lordan keeps losing segment profit while the group distributes cash and funds capacity that has not yet begun to pay back, the first quarter will look more like the start of a transition year than an inflection point.

Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.

The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.

The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.

Found an issue in this analysis?Editorial corrections and sharp feedback help keep the coverage honest.
Report a correction