Baran in the First Quarter: NIS 3.7 Billion Backlog Meets Negative Cash Flow and a Rights Offering
Baran opened 2026 with 22% revenue growth and open backlog of roughly NIS 3.7 billion, but gross profit contracted and operating cash flow stayed negative. The NIS 72.6 million rights offering after quarter end improves liquidity, while also showing that backlog-to-cash conversion still needs outside capital.
Baran opened 2026 with only a partial answer to the question left open at the end of 2025: whether the large backlog is beginning to turn into profit and cash. First-quarter revenue rose 22%, and open backlog used for covenant purposes stands at roughly NIS 3.7 billion, so demand is not the issue. But gross profit fell 14%, the gross margin narrowed to 9%, and operating cash flow stayed negative even after receivables and accrued income declined. The NIS 72.6 million rights offering after the balance-sheet date strengthens liquidity, but it also shows that backlog-to-cash conversion still needs outside capital. The quarter proves that activity is moving. It still does not prove that the activity funds itself. The next proof points are project margins, actual collections, and the conversion of African MOUs into funded agreements.
Revenue Rose, Margins Did Not
Baran is an engineering and project-execution company. Its economics are measured less by revenue and more by the ability to reach milestones, bill, collect and preserve margin after execution costs, credit, guarantees and leases. The first quarter is therefore a direct continuation of the prior annual analysis, Baran in 2025: The Backlog Is Here, Now It Needs to Become Cash: the backlog exists, now it has to turn into cash.
Group revenue reached NIS 201.7 million, compared with NIS 164.9 million in the parallel quarter. Gross profit fell to NIS 18.0 million, from NIS 21.0 million, and the gross margin fell to 9% from 13%. Operating profit rose slightly to NIS 8.6 million, but net profit fell to NIS 3.2 million, mainly because the company moved from net finance income of NIS 2.5 million to net finance expense of NIS 5.4 million.
| Segment | Q1 2026 Revenue | Change vs Parallel Quarter | Operating Profit | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baran International | NIS 83.5 million | about +43% | NIS 6.2 million | Growth arrived, but operating margin fell to 7% |
| Baran Israel | NIS 117.4 million | about +11% | NIS 4.2 million | The execution unit lifted revenue, profit barely changed |
| Energy Development | NIS 0.8 million | about +10% | NIS 0.5 million loss | Still small relative to the investments and balance sheet |
The sharper number sits in the gross profit of the two core engines. International increased revenue by about NIS 25.3 million, yet gross profit fell from about NIS 12.0 million to about NIS 10.3 million. Israel increased revenue by about NIS 11.4 million, yet gross profit fell from about NIS 12.0 million to NIS 10.6 million. This is not a demand problem. It is a question of execution quality and project mix.
The Backlog Is Larger, Maturity Is Still Partial
Open backlog under the covenant framework stands at roughly NIS 3.696 billion, far above the NIS 500 million covenant threshold. That is comfortable for lenders, but it does not resolve the quality question. In a project company, backlog is the start of work, not the end of the process. Value arrives only when the project is funded, executed, billed and collected.
International provided most of the positive signal in the quarter, with revenue rising partly because of specific execution in multi-year projects and milestone achievement. At the same time, post-balance-sheet events add a new layer of opportunities that are not yet certain economics. On May 21, 2026, a subsidiary signed an MOU for a West African project estimated at about EUR 90 million. On May 26, 2026, two additional MOUs were signed in a country in southern Africa, each for about USD 150 million.
These are large amounts relative to the current scale of activity, but all remain subject to final or detailed agreements and project financing. Exclusivity in the MOUs keeps the company at the table. It does not replace financing and it does not create cash flow. The market is therefore likely to measure each update by the move from MOU to binding funded contract, not by the headline amount.
Cash Rose Because of Funding and the Rights Offering
The cash position should be read through all-in cash flexibility after actual cash uses: operating cash flow, property and equipment purchases, lease liability repayments, debt repayments and investing movements. On that basis, the quarter still does not free the company from funding needs.
Operating cash flow was negative NIS 12.1 million. The decline in receivables and accrued income added NIS 7.6 million to operating cash before interest and taxes, but lower supplier and other payable balances pulled roughly NIS 28.7 million of cash out of the business. Collections improved, but not enough to make operations a self-funded cash source.
Cash and cash equivalents rose from NIS 89.0 million to NIS 107.1 million, but the increase came from NIS 25.2 million of financing cash flow. That included NIS 10.1 million of long-term loans and a NIS 22.7 million net increase in short-term credit. Against that, the company repaid NIS 4.8 million of lease liabilities and NIS 2.9 million of long-term loans.
After the balance-sheet date came the more important event: a rights offering in which about 90% of the offered shares were exercised, generating gross proceeds of about NIS 72.6 million and issuance expenses of about NIS 0.3 million. This is meaningful against NIS 298.6 million of equity at quarter-end, and it comes while the company complies with its covenants: equity of about NIS 276 million versus an NIS 80 million minimum, an equity-to-assets ratio of about 30% versus a 24% minimum, and open backlog of about NIS 3.696 billion versus a NIS 500 million threshold.
Still, the offering is not only a strengthening move. It is also a signal that the current model needs more capital until projects start releasing cash. If the new money lowers credit pressure and supports orderly collections, the first quarter may look like a transition period. If it mainly funds another layer of projects and development before cash flow stabilizes, the discussion will remain about funding.
Conclusion
Baran’s first quarter strengthens the business side and weakens the cash side. The company is selling more, holding a larger backlog and adding large international opportunities, but the two core engines kept less gross profit and operating cash flow has not recovered. The rights offering gives the company time and flexibility, but it is not proof that backlog is already funding itself.
The current read is that the company is in a proof year. The market is likely to measure it less by another MOU and more by three items: a recovery in gross margin, positive or near-breakeven operating cash flow, and the conversion of international projects into funded contracts. The counter-thesis is that the first quarter mainly reflects timing and mix, and that the rights offering will be enough until large projects begin releasing cash. For that to happen, the backlog needs to start working for shareholders without requiring another layer of funding.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.