Keystone Infra in the First Quarter: Cash Rose, Recurring Cash From Assets Fell
Keystone opened 2026 with a larger cash balance, the Egged transaction and progress in data centers, but the quarter sharpened a more important gap: most of the cash came from capital transactions, not recurring portfolio distributions. The read now shifts from NAV and monetizations to how much cash can move up from Egged, IPM and Sorek.
Keystone Infra opened 2026 from a more comfortable financial position, but also with a higher proof bar. Cash rose to NIS 447.8 million, mainly because of the sale of part of the Egged partnership and option exercises, while dividend, interest and loan-receipt income fell to NIS 12.5 million and operating cash flow was negative. This is not a weak report: equity is NIS 3.1 billion, LTV is low, IPM delivered operating improvement, and shareholders have already approved the internal-management reset. But the quarter changes the question. After 2025, when Egged and Keystone Power carried much of the value story, the next quarters need to show cash coming up from assets, not only value being recorded or monetized. With the share trading on May 25, 2026 around NIS 23.4, versus pre-tax NAV of NIS 17.5 per share and post-tax NAV of NIS 15.5, the market is no longer settling for the existence of good assets. It needs proof that value can move through debt, partnerships, management fees and development projects and reach shareholders.
Company Overview
Keystone is an infrastructure investment company. It does not operate one infrastructure asset, but holds value layers that produce fair value, distributions and development upside at different speeds. The analysis therefore has to separate three things: fair value in the accounts, cash received from portfolio companies, and development projects that can increase value but require capital and time before they release cash.
The structure is still highly concentrated. The Egged partnership is carried at NIS 2.66 billion and Keystone Power at NIS 1.31 billion. Together they represent roughly 86% of the NIS 4.62 billion investment portfolio. The rest includes Eranovum, Sunflower, VID Ashkelon and Cinturion, but the economic read of the quarter mostly runs through Egged, Keystone Power and the parent company's ability to receive cash from them.
Cash Rose From Transactions, Not Recurring Distributions
The convenient headline is a stronger cash balance. Cash and equivalents rose from NIS 313.9 million at the end of 2025 to NIS 447.8 million at the end of March. But all-in cash flexibility after actual uses was built mainly by capital events: NIS 374.8 million from selling part of the Egged partnership and NIS 78.1 million from option exercises, against NIS 288.8 million invested in holdings, NIS 21.1 million of dividends paid and NIS 9.2 million used in operating activity.
That buys the company time, but it does not yet prove recurring portfolio cash generation. In the first quarter, dividend, interest and loan-receipt income totaled only NIS 12.5 million, down from NIS 28.2 million in the comparable quarter. All of it came from VID, while Keystone Power and Sunflower mainly contributed through fair-value changes. Net profit of NIS 32.3 million is therefore less important here than its composition.
Management fees show the same friction. They rose to NIS 12.2 million from NIS 8.5 million in the comparable quarter because the old agreement is still tied to asset value. In the previous analysis of the management reset, the saving stood against the price: cancelling management fees should leave more cash in the company, but it comes with a 5% share issuance to the management company and a more visible control block. Shareholders approved the move on May 20, 2026, but completion is still subject to Antitrust Authority approval, TASE approval and a tax ruling by August 31, 2026, with a possible extension to February 28, 2027.
Egged, IPM And Development Keep The Year Open
Egged remains the central asset. The second option exercise in January raised the Egged partnership's stake in Egged to 91.4%, and the sale of 10% of the partnership to Meitav Provident and Pension brought Keystone about NIS 375 million and implied an Egged value of about NIS 6 billion. After the transaction, Keystone holds 71.1% of the partnership, which gives it an indirect stake of about 65% in Egged, while it keeps 100% of the general partner.
Egged's results in the quarter were weaker than the value implied by the transaction. Revenue fell to NIS 1.37 billion, EBITDA fell to NIS 277.8 million and net profit fell to NIS 25.4 million. The explanation includes lower equipment-fund income, the impact of the "Lion's Roar" war, an employee bonus tied to bringing an investor into Egged, and the absence of a NIS 34 million one-off finance income recorded in the comparable period. Operating cash flow at Egged rose to NIS 232.9 million. The issue is not asset quality, but access: how much of that cash can move up to Keystone after the partnership's debt and distribution limits.
At Keystone Power, IPM provided the best proof point. On a 100% basis, IPM revenue rose to NIS 243.9 million, EBITDA rose to NIS 80.8 million and net profit jumped to NIS 46.0 million. The improvement came mainly from higher sales to private customers through bilateral sales instead of sales to the system operator, which is closer to operating cash than another fair-value movement. Still, Ramat Hovav and Hagit weakened because of a fault in units 8 and 9, currency movements and the supplementary-tariff limitation that took effect in February 2025. Keystone Power matters, but the quarter shows it is not one asset moving in a straight line.
Development tells a similar story: progress, but not enough disclosure to translate it into cash. In the IPM data-center project, excavation and shoring permits were received, excavation began, and the target is early 2028 operation for two buildings with total capacity of about 40 MW-IT. Requests for temporary relief relating to the project were rejected on April 1, 2026. This is real progress versus a land-and-planning stage, but the project still lacks a binding customer, financing structure, CAPEX disclosure and commercial terms. In Sorek, Keystone is expected to provide loans to fund 40% of the equity and guarantees, with a conversion option into equity after operation begins. Sorek's contribution in 2026 is therefore not revenue, but financing completion on terms that do not weaken the economics already embedded in value.
Conclusion
The first quarter strengthens the quality of Keystone's asset base and financial flexibility, but weakens the reading that 2026 has already become a recurring-cash year. Cash grew mainly from the Egged partial sale and option exercises. Profit relied on fair-value changes at Keystone Power and Sunflower, while recurring receipts fell. Egged continues to justify a high value, but the path to cash at the listed-company level still runs through the partnership and its debt. IPM delivered a good operating proof point, but Ramat Hovav, Hagit, Sorek, the data centers and Eranovum still need execution, financing or a higher revenue pace.
Keystone entered 2026 stronger, but less cheap relative to its reported value. The read can improve in the next quarters if the management reset is completed without burdensome terms, more cash comes from assets rather than monetizations, and Sorek and data centers advance with disclosure on financing, customer and timing. It would weaken if the new cash is absorbed by further investments, management fees continue because the reset is delayed, or the premium to NAV moved ahead of the pace of proof.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.