Encore Properties in the First Quarter: Series D Is Solved, Northpoint Is Still the Next Funding Event
Encore opened 2026 with higher NOI and more revenue-producing assets, but all-in cash flexibility still weakened after interest, investments, and financing outflows. The post-balance-sheet Series D redemption removes one near-term risk, while the Northpoint loan due in August 2026 remains the central proof point.
Encore Properties gives a partial answer in the first quarter of 2026 to the question left open at year-end 2025: Series D should no longer be the debt wall that defines the year, but the company is still in a financial bridge period. NOI rose to $8.6 million, operating profit improved to $4.3 million, and the assets acquired in 2025 are now showing up more clearly in rental revenue. Still, all-in cash flexibility did not improve: operating cash flow of $4.5 million did not cover $9.9 million of interest paid, investments, and negative financing cash flow, and cash declined by $6.7 million from the start of the year. After the balance-sheet date, the company issued Series F and fully redeemed Series D early, removing the July 2026 event but replacing it with new secured debt maturing in 2030. The unresolved point is Northpoint, with roughly $23.5 million of debt due in August 2026, 80.37% occupancy, and a 71.99% collection rate in the quarter. So this is not a full turning-point quarter. It is a quarter in which the assets are working better, while the financing layer still determines how much of that improvement actually reaches bondholders and equity holders.
Series D Is Off the Table, Northpoint Is Still on It
Encore is a U.S. income-producing real estate company that raises debt in Tel Aviv and holds a mixed portfolio of retail, residential, and hotel assets in the United States. This is not a standard actively traded equity story with a current market-cap screen in the local data. It is mainly a debt-market story: duration, collateral, interest cost, refinancing access, and whether asset-level NOI is enough to service debt at the public-company layer.
In the previous annual coverage, the 2026 question had two parts: Series D and Northpoint. The first quarter closes the first part more clearly. At the end of March, the company had current bond maturities of $55.4 million, of which about $45.6 million related to Series D. On May 3, 2026, the company completed an issuance of NIS 130 million par value Series F bonds, with a 6.8% annual coupon, and on May 17, 2026 used the proceeds to fully redeem Series D early. Series F is repaid in one principal payment in January 2030 and is secured, among other things, by first mortgages on DoubleTree Suites Hotel, Washington Plaza, and Darlington Square, together with pledged rights in the property companies.
That is real progress, but not deleveraging. It replaces near-term debt with longer secured debt, and shifts the focus to the Northpoint Center loan. That property still carries roughly $23.5 million of principal due in August 2026, and the company intends to refinance it before maturity. The LTV on the loan is 63%, so the issue is not a property with no value. The issue is the quality of the evidence the property brings to lenders.
| Funding point | Position at March 2026 | What changed after the balance date | What remains open |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series D | About $45.6 million current debt | Fully redeemed early on May 17, 2026 using Series F | The debt was replaced with secured 2030 debt |
| Series F | Not on the balance sheet | NIS 130 million par value, 6.8% coupon, principal in January 2030 | Ongoing collateral and leverage ratios |
| Northpoint | About $23.5 million due in August 2026 | No refinancing reported yet | Occupancy, collections, and refinancing terms |
NOI Rose, but Cash Did Not Move at the Same Pace
The positive operating number is NOI of $8.6 million, compared with $6.2 million in the prior-year quarter, an increase of about 38%. Total revenue rose to $12.4 million from $9.5 million, mainly because new properties added about $2.8 million to rental revenue. Gross profit rose to $5.9 million, and operating profit rose to $4.3 million from $2.5 million.
But this quarter cannot be read only through NOI. The company itself notes that NOI is not operating cash flow under accounting rules and does not represent cash available to fund all of the company’s cash needs. The relevant calculation here is all-in cash flexibility: operating cash flow, less investments, repayments, interest, and actual financing cash flows. On that basis, the quarter is much more cautious.
Operating cash flow was $4.5 million, only slightly above $4.1 million in the prior-year quarter. Against that, the company paid $9.9 million of interest, compared with $4.3 million in the prior-year quarter, and financing cash flow was negative $9.6 million. Investment cash flow was relatively modest at $1.5 million, but total cash declined from $44.8 million at the start of the year to $38.1 million at the end of March. Including restricted deposits, cash fell from about $47.0 million at year-end 2025 to about $39.7 million at quarter-end.
That gap matters because it prevents an overly clean reading of the quarter. NOI improves the company’s starting position with lenders, but it still does not turn the public-company layer into a free cash flow source for shareholders. The FFO metrics point in the same direction: FFO under the regulatory approach was negative $1.9 million, and the amount attributable to shareholders was negative $2.2 million. Even after management adjustments, the company’s share of AFFO was still negative, at $0.6 million. That does not erase the operating improvement, but it explains why the market should not read higher NOI as if it has already solved the financing layer.
The Assets Are Working Better, but Not With the Same Quality
The quarter’s growth comes mainly from two places: assets added in 2025 and the Preferred-equity investment layer in residential real estate. Equity-method investments stood at $112.6 million at the end of March, almost unchanged from year-end 2025 but far above $42.7 million in the prior-year quarter. That is now a meaningful layer in the portfolio, and it also contributed to the company’s $1.5 million share of profits from equity-method investees in the quarter.
The problem is that this layer is not the same as cash immediately reaching the public company. That was also the warning point in the previous coverage of Preferred equity and accessible cash, and the first quarter does not close it. There are more assets, more NOI, and more accounting contribution from equity-method companies, but parent-company operating cash flow was only $1.5 million, and parent-company cash declined from $37.0 million to $30.4 million.
The operating portfolio is also uneven. Retail became the main growth engine: segment revenue rose to $5.3 million from $2.4 million, and gross profit rose to $2.9 million from $1.3 million. Residential revenue declined slightly to $2.6 million, but gross profit remained relatively high at $1.9 million. Hotels barely grew revenue, at $4.5 million versus $4.4 million, and their gross profit slipped slightly to $1.1 million.
Northpoint is the best example of why the question is not only whether an asset exists, but in what condition it reaches a financing date. Average occupancy in the quarter was 80.37%, above 77% in 2025, which is a positive direction. But the collection rate in the quarter was 71.99%, lower than most residential assets and a large part of the other retail assets. Before the August 2026 refinancing, the mix of occupancy, collections, LTV, and debt terms will matter more than another quarter of higher consolidated NOI.
Conclusion
The first quarter improves Encore’s starting point, but it does not make 2026 simple. Series D was resolved after the balance-sheet date, a meaningful change from the risk that was open at year-end 2025. At the same time, the Series D solution did not create free cash. It replaced the debt with new secured debt. Northpoint remains the next funding event, and the company needs to reach it with more convincing occupancy and collections, not only with property value and a reasonable LTV.
The current read is that the company’s assets are working better than the year-end 2025 numbers suggested, but the public-company layer still requires more financing support than the NOI headline implies. What could improve the market’s interpretation over the next quarters is a Northpoint refinancing on reasonable terms, continued growth in operating cash flow without additional owner support, and evidence that part of the Preferred investments is moving from accounting yield to actual distributions. What would weaken the picture is a refinancing that requires heavier collateral, interest continuing to absorb most operating cash flow, or Northpoint collections staying weak before the maturity date.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.