Follow-up on Ari Real Estate: in Eilat the terminal is complete, but the cash test is only starting
The Eilat terminal is complete and the sale process has moved into valuation, but Star Eilat still sits on a short-term loan of about NIS 368 million and long-term financing that has not yet been signed. The next test is not whether the project exists, but when it starts releasing cash instead of consuming it.
The first quarter put Ari Real Estate back in front of the same gap that runs through its development portfolio: assets are advancing faster than the cash they can release today. Eilat is the cleanest case of that gap. The public transport terminal has been completed, the public-housing authority has announced its intention to buy the terminal, and the parties moved to appoint a valuer, but the mall around it is still under construction and in marketing. A 45% marketed rate means this is not just land with a good presentation. There is already an initial commercial demand signal. Still, against a book value of NIS 625 million and expected construction costs of NIS 920 million, Star Ari Eilat carries a short-term loan of about NIS 368 million and the company intends to replace it with long-term bank financing. The current read is cautiously positive: Eilat passed a real execution milestone, but it has not yet moved from potential monetization to a cash source that reduces balance-sheet pressure. The next proof points are the terminal sale price and closing timetable, signed long-term financing for the mall, and further marketing beyond 45% without widening the cash gap.
The terminal is complete, but the deal has not yet brought in cash
The terminal completion mainly changes the risk stage. Until March, Eilat was a construction project with a public component that still had to be completed. Since March 10, that physical component is complete, alongside notice from the public-housing authority that it intends to buy the terminal under its contractual right. That matters because it moves part of the project from execution into valuation and possible monetization.
But a valuation is not proceeds, and an intention to buy is not yet cash in the bank. For the terminal to change Eilat's funding picture, investors need to see price, transaction terms, closing timetable, and most importantly what happens to the proceeds: whether they reduce short-term debt, fund the mall, or merely cover part of the remaining construction. That is the difference between a milestone that strengthens the project story and an event that materially changes the company's cash flexibility.
This distinction matters because the mall does not disappear after a terminal sale. The terminal can release capital or improve the financing position, but the main future value still sits in the commercial center: tenants, occupancy, construction cost and completion in 2028. The March event therefore improves the probability of progress, but it does not close the Eilat test.
The mall is partly marketed, but it is not yet an income property
Star Eilat is already carried at NIS 624.6 million, but its first-quarter NOI was only NIS 956 thousand, and the property table still shows no occupancy rate or effective yield. That is not a failure in itself. An asset under construction should not look like a mature retail center. But it explains why project value has not yet replaced cash flow.
The company presents Eilat as a retail and transport-terminal project with expected NOI of NIS 85 million, estimated completion in 2028, NIS 403 million already invested and expected construction costs of NIS 920 million. The 45% marketing rate is positive, mainly because it shows the project no longer rests only on a plan. Still, more than half the space has yet to be signed, and the disclosure is not enough to judge tenant quality, anchors, lease terms or the expected delivery pace.
That leads to the current judgment: early marketing supports the project, but it is not enough to turn the expected NOI into a number the market can measure over the coming quarters. As long as the commercial center is not producing income, Eilat's value remains more dependent on financing and future contract terms than on operating results already flowing through the statements.
The short-term loan is the real test
The number that sharpens Eilat is not the NIS 625 million book value, but the roughly NIS 368 million short-term loan related to Star Ari Eilat. The company's working-capital deficit at the end of March was about NIS 497 million, and the first item it identifies is that Eilat short-term loan. The intention to take a long-term bank loan to continue funding mall construction is not a technical detail. It is the path through which the project is supposed to move from an expensive and limited interim period to a financing structure better suited to an asset still under construction.
That is also why the terminal and mall need to be read together. If the terminal sale closes on good terms and long-term financing is signed at the same time, Eilat can move from a cash-consuming focus to a source that eases the debt structure. If the sale is delayed and financing remains short term, the terminal completion will look like operational progress trapped inside a more stretched balance sheet.
The board concluded that the working-capital deficit does not indicate a liquidity problem, and the company points to positive operating cash flow of about NIS 60 million a year. That is a legitimate counterpoint. But for Eilat, the test is not whether the group can meet its obligations today. The test is whether the project presented as a growth engine can stop relying on short-term debt before the more expensive construction stages approach.
The all-in cash picture explains why Eilat matters now
The cash view needs to separate maintenance-style cash generation from the all-in cash picture. In the first quarter, operating cash flow was NIS 9.8 million, but investing activity used NIS 257.8 million, financing activity brought in NIS 165.4 million, and cash balances ultimately fell by NIS 82.6 million. This is the picture after actual period cash uses and financing flows, not an estimate of the recurring cash power of the existing assets.
Not all of that gap is Eilat. Payment for the Ashdod logistics-center acquisition was a central cash use, and the company also took a NIS 103 million long-term loan for it. But Eilat does appear in the two places that matter for the funding test: about NIS 40 million of construction investment lifted investment property and investment property under construction, and current credit increased partly because of Star Eilat loans. The project is advancing, but it is advancing through cash uses and debt before it produces meaningful NOI.
That makes Eilat more a financing test than a classic real-estate test. The question is not whether there is an asset or whether the terminal has really been completed. The question is whether the physical progress is enough to attract long-term financing and sale proceeds in time, so the project does not keep competing for the same cash pool with Tel Hashomer, Jerusalem, Ashdod and the April 2027 Series A bond maturity.
The updated view on Eilat is better than before the terminal completion, but still not enough to treat the project as a proven cash source. The terminal has been completed and the sale process has advanced, 45% of the mall is already marketed, and the company presents a meaningful 2028 NOI target. Against that stand a short-term loan of about NIS 368 million, the need for long-term bank financing, and an open question around the terminal sale price and timing. Clear sale terms, long-term financing and quality leasing progress can move Eilat from a large reported asset to a source that eases the balance sheet. Without those three, the terminal completion remains an important milestone, but not proof that Ari's cash test has already been solved.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.