Danal HR Services: Why Revenue Grew While Profitability Slipped
In 2025 Danal's HR segment lifted revenue to NIS 458.8 million mainly through projects and foreign-worker activity, but operating profit fell to NIS 23.1 million and margin slipped to 5.0%. This follow-up shows that the 2024 comparison effect explains only part of the gap, while the 2025 quarterly path already points to a more genuine margin reset.
The main article left HR as one of the open questions in Danal's 2025 read. This follow-up isolates the narrower issue: how can a segment grow revenue and still finish the year with less profit and a lower margin.
Management's official explanation is relatively comfortable. The 2024 profitability base benefited from one-off income from customers, so the 2025 comparison looks harsher than the underlying business trend. That is part of the story, not all of it. The company does not quantify that one-off income, and at the same time the quarterly series shows revenue rising through 2025 while operating profit moved lower.
So the conservative read here is not a full structural break, but it is not "just a comparison effect" either. 2025 looks more like a margin reset year. Growth came mainly from managed projects and foreign-worker activity in construction, yet the year-end exit rate already fell to a 4.3% operating margin in Q4 2025, versus 6.2% in the comparable quarter and roughly 5.7% in the first half of the year.
The Comparison Effect Explains Part of It, Not All of It
The annual view shows why this debate exists at all. Revenue in the HR segment rose to NIS 458.8 million from NIS 434.5 million, a 5.6% increase. At the same time, operating profit fell to NIS 23.1 million from NIS 30.3 million, a 23.8% decline, and the operating margin slipped to 5.0% from 7.0%.
| Metric | 2024 | 2025 | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | NIS 434.5 million | NIS 458.8 million | Volume kept growing |
| Operating profit | NIS 30.3 million | NIS 23.1 million | Profit did not follow revenue |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | 5.0% | Almost 2 percentage points of erosion |
| Fourth-quarter operating profit | NIS 6.9 million | NIS 5.1 million | The year-end exit rate weakened too |
The company itself attributes the profit decline mainly to one-off income from customers in 2024. That is a legitimate point, but it remains incomplete. The filing does not quantify that one-off income, so there is no precise way to normalize how much of the 2024 profit should be stripped out. Once the company leaves that amount undisclosed, the cleaner read has to move from the annual comparison to the quarterly path.
The 2025 Quarterly Slope Already Looks Like A Lower Margin Base
This is where the presentation is more useful than the narrative text. It opens 2025 quarter by quarter and shows a pattern that cannot be explained only by the 2024 comparison effect. Revenue in the four quarters of 2025 was NIS 113.1 million, NIS 111.4 million, NIS 115.6 million, and NIS 118.7 million. Operating profit in those same quarters was NIS 6.3 million, NIS 6.4 million, NIS 5.4 million, and NIS 5.1 million.
That is the key distinction between a comparison artifact and a more genuine operating shift. If the whole issue were just a one-off customer payment in 2024, one would expect at least intrayear stability in 2025, or even improvement as revenue expanded. That is not what happened. In the first half of 2025 the segment produced NIS 12.7 million of operating profit on NIS 224.5 million of revenue, or about a 5.7% margin. In the second half revenue actually rose to NIS 234.3 million, but operating profit fell to NIS 10.5 million, or only about a 4.5% margin.
In other words, the segment was not only comparing against a higher 2024 base. It also finished 2025 at a lower profitability level than the one with which it started the year. That is already an operating signal, not just an accounting one.
Growth Came Through Projects And Foreign Workers. That Helps Volume, Not Automatically Margin
The company explicitly says that growth in 2025, and in the fourth quarter as well, came mainly from higher activity in projects and in the foreign-worker corporation for construction. That matters because the annual report also explains how the segment's economics work. The three main operating models are employment, outsourcing, and placement. In most cases where the company employs the worker, billing is based on hours worked or on gross salary plus a markup. At the same time, part of the projects activity is managed-services work for public bodies and large customers.
That means revenue can scale faster than pricing power. If there are more hours, more workers, and more logistics around projects and foreign workers, revenue rises. But in order to preserve profitability, the markup, operating efficiency, and management layer all have to hold. The filing does not disclose an internal profit split between placement, payroll and employment services, managed projects, and foreign-worker activity. So it does not prove directly that 2025 growth came from weaker-margin lines. What it does prove is that the segment shifted toward those growth engines exactly while the overall margin declined.
The competitive structure does not help either. The company itself describes an industry with relatively low barriers to entry, roughly 2,866 active companies, and many smaller players that charge lower rates. In plain English, this is an industry where more volume does not automatically mean more pricing power. So the 5.6% revenue increase does not prove that the segment became higher quality. It proves only that there was more business.
There is also a more interesting implication between the lines. The group's broader strategy speaks about improving operating efficiency and profitability through technology, better work methods, and structural changes. When that is read together with the 2025 HR trajectory, it looks less like a generic growth statement and more like an admission that growth by itself is no longer enough for this segment.
The Backlog Supports Activity, Not Necessarily Profitability
At first glance, the backlog actually looks reasonable. At the end of 2025 it stood at NIS 207.3 million, versus NIS 202.3 million at the end of 2024. As of 23 March 2026 it stood at NIS 178.2 million.
That chart sharpens an important point. The decline between year-end 2025 and 23 March 2026 does not reflect weaker later backlog. It comes entirely from the first-quarter 2026 bucket, which stood at NIS 29.1 million at year-end and moved to zero near the report date, while all later buckets remained unchanged. So from a workload perspective there is no collapse here.
But this backlog needs to be read correctly. The company itself says that most customers in the segment operate under framework agreements and are not committed to buy services in a specific volume, or at all. The disclosed backlog comes mainly from certain engagements, especially multi-year public-tender contracts where the company is committed to provide the service over several years. So backlog is a good visibility measure for projects and managed services. It is a much weaker measure for the question of whether margin will recover.
That is also why the 2025 gap between revenue and profit is not solved by the backlog line. Danal proved that it has work. It has not yet proved that this work enters at the old margin level.
Bottom Line
The easy read says the erosion in HR is mainly a comparison-base issue. The dramatic read says the segment has entered a structural breakdown. Both are too extreme.
The more precise read is that Danal's HR segment entered 2026 after a partial but real margin reset. The 2024 comparison base clearly makes the annual view look worse, but the 2025 path itself, from the first quarter through the fourth, shows that the issue does not stop there. Growth came through projects and foreign workers, the backlog stayed reasonable, but the margin exit rate moved lower.
That does not mean the segment is broken. NIS 23.1 million of operating profit still represents a profitable business, and the backlog into 2026 and 2027 remains intact. It does mean the test in the coming reports has become sharper: will the same volume growth start flowing back into operating profit, or will Danal remain with a segment that can produce revenue only at a lower margin than the one it used to earn.
If Q1 and Q2 of 2026 show revenue holding up together with a margin that moves back above the Q4 2025 exit level, the 2024 comparison effect will deserve more weight. If revenue keeps rising while operating profit stays around NIS 5 million per quarter, it will become harder and harder to argue that this was only one-off noise.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.