Aran R&D: Can the Defense Backlog Become Real Margin in 2026?
By the end of 2025, the development-and-manufacturing segment backlog already looked far more production-heavy, with NIS 37.6 million of manufacturing projects versus just NIS 3.7 million of planning and development work. With utilization still below 50% of potential capacity, 2026 can become a margin proof year only if that backlog turns into execution density rather than staying an order headline.
The main article made the broad point: defense demand is no longer just an implication buried inside Aran's filings. It has moved into explicit orders, a larger backlog, and a real change in business direction. This continuation isolates the next question, and the more important one for 2026: can that backlog finally become a margin lever rather than just more proof that demand exists.
That question matters now because the two ends of the story still sit far apart. On one side, the company says it received defense-market production orders totaling NIS 49 million during the reporting period and up to the publication date, ended 2025 with NIS 41.9 million of backlog in the development-and-manufacturing segment, and still estimates that it is operating at below 50% of potential production capacity. On the other side, the same segment ended 2025 with NIS 110.2 million of revenue, NIS 11.05 million of gross profit, but only NIS 839 thousand of ordinary operating profit and NIS 401 thousand before tax. In other words, the debate is no longer whether there is demand. The debate is whether the new workload can absorb the cost base and turn serial production into profitable density.
Why the Debate Has Shifted From Demand to Conversion
What matters in the two immediate reports approved for this continuation is not only the amount, but also the character of the orders.
| Disclosure point | What was disclosed | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| December 25, 2025 | Two binding orders worth NIS 18.45 million and one cancellable order worth NIS 2.95 million, together NIS 21.4 million | This is already commercial scale rather than pilot activity. One of the orders includes a product developed by the company and chosen as a unique solution in unmanned aerial systems |
| March 9, 2026 | A binding Ministry of Defense order worth NIS 4.8 million, and together with additional binding orders from the prior three months, NIS 8.5 million | At least part of the demand comes as a repeat order for products the company had already developed and manufactured before, meaning it sits on an existing platform rather than a greenfield project |
| Annual report | Defense-market production orders totaling NIS 49 million during the period and up to the report publication date | The two immediate reports are not isolated wins. They sit inside a broader defense-order flow |
That is the real change. The story is becoming less about one-off development work and more about repeat products, production series, and customers coming back. The December report even hints at better economics inside the order mix: one of the binding orders includes a product developed by the company itself and chosen as a unique solution for drone systems. The March report points to an additional order for products that had already been developed and manufactured for the Ministry of Defense in the past. That does not guarantee a high margin, but it does change the economic type of the work. Once the business moves from one-off development toward repeat production, the margin question shifts from whether there is a customer to whether the plant can run at a density that absorbs the cost layer.
Why the 2025 Backlog Already Looks More Manufacturable
The strongest evidence does not sit in the headlines. It sits in the backlog table. At the end of 2024, backlog stood at NIS 35.98 million, of which NIS 19.64 million came from planning and development projects and only NIS 16.34 million from production projects. By the end of 2025, the picture had almost flipped: backlog rose to NIS 41.86 million, but NIS 37.57 million of it now sat in production projects and only NIS 3.74 million in planning and development.
Almost 90% of the end-2025 backlog already comes from production projects. A year earlier, production accounted for only about 45% of backlog. That is a material change rather than a cosmetic one. It also fits what the company had already delivered in the income statement during 2025: production revenue in the segment rose to NIS 36.99 million from NIS 26.13 million in 2024, up about 41.6%, while planning and development revenue fell to NIS 14.57 million from NIS 30.63 million. In other words, the shift toward production had already started in actual revenue, not only in backlog.
The more important point is the historical conversion profile. Out of the end-2024 backlog, the entire production component, NIS 16.34 million, was executed during 2025. Planning and development was the weaker layer instead, with two projects frozen at the customer's initiative and only NIS 17.97 million out of NIS 19.64 million executed. That means the new backlog is not only larger. It also rests much more heavily on the layer the company has already shown it can convert into actual work.
The picture gets sharper when the schedule is added. Out of the NIS 41.86 million backlog at the end of 2025, NIS 33.74 million is expected to be recognized already in 2026, while only NIS 7.57 million slips into 2027. Out of the 2026 amount, NIS 14.22 million is allocated to the first quarter and NIS 10.25 million to the second quarter. That means roughly 72.6% of the expected 2026 recognition is already concentrated in the first half.
This is where capacity matters. The company says it expanded its production means and capacity during the period, is focusing on projects that combine planning and development alongside serial production, and strengthened the management bench with executives carrying relevant defense-industry and defense-system experience. But in the same filing it also says it is still running below 50% of potential production capacity. The implication cuts both ways: there is still open operating leverage here, but it has not been proven in the reported numbers yet. As long as capacity stays underfilled, the theoretical advantage of serial production remains only half realized.
Where Margin Still Gets Lost
That is exactly why the next stage of the read has to move from order volume to the profit line. The development, planning, and manufacturing segment did grow to NIS 110.17 million of revenue in 2025, but what remained at the end of the chain was still extremely thin.
| 2025 segment layer | Amount | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | NIS 110.17 million | There is real activity volume |
| Gross profit | NIS 11.05 million | There is gross profit, but not a very high one relative to volume |
| Gross margin | 9.7% | Lower than 10.7% in 2024 |
| Attributed expenses | NIS 10.21 million | Almost the entire gross profit is consumed before the operating layer |
| Ordinary operating profit | NIS 839 thousand | Already very thin relative to revenue |
| Profit before tax | NIS 401 thousand | This is where it becomes clear how little of the volume actually turns into profit |
This chart explains why capacity is really a margin question. In 2025, about 92% of the segment's gross profit was absorbed by attributed expenses. So if 2026 brings more production on top of the infrastructure that has already been expanded, profit can move faster than revenue. That is the economics of density: not just a few more millions of orders, but how much of that additional work can move through the production floor without the upper cost layer rising at the same pace.
But this is also where the main caveat sits. The company itself says the decline in gross margin from 2024 to 2025 mainly came from technological-consulting activity in software. So even if the defense backlog looks better, it does not sit inside a clean segment. If the software layer keeps weighing on profitability, defense alone will not guarantee that the entire segment margins up.
There is a second constraint, and it is execution pace. The company states that backlog includes the remaining work under signed orders or signed binding agreements, but in most engagements the customer has the right to stop the work. Cancellation is exercised only rarely, if at all, but the right still exists. In such a case, the company is usually entitled only to payment for work already performed, reimbursement of procurement costs, and an agreed margin. The company also says explicitly that part of backlog is sometimes not realized on the originally expected schedule because execution is postponed for customer-related reasons. So even a better-quality production backlog does not automatically equal margin on time.
The third constraint is external. The company warns that the absence of an approved annual Israeli government budget can mean that even tenders it has already won are not translated into actual orders, which can hurt 2026 revenue from the defense market. This is exactly the type of issue that turns the discussion from "demand exists" into "conversion happens."
What Needs To Be Seen in 2026
Test one: the production backlog has to turn into revenue on something close to the schedule already embedded in the table, especially in the first half. If the early 2026 quarters do not show that recognition, the market will start asking whether the issue is timing, budget, or execution.
Test two: utilization has to start moving up without raw materials, subcontractors, or quality-control costs absorbing the whole benefit. The entire logic of the expanded production base and defense-oriented management bench is tested here, not in the order headline.
Test three: repeat orders for products that have already been developed need to show better economics than one-off development projects. That does not have to appear as an immediate dramatic jump, but it does need to appear as an improvement in the segment profit line.
Test four: the defense momentum has to be strong enough to outweigh the drag from software and any delays among state-linked customers. If that does not happen, 2026 may remain another year of impressive order flow without a real step-up in profit.
The bottom line of this continuation is fairly sharp: Aran has already shown that it has an open door into the defense market. What it still has not shown is that this door creates enough production density to change the profit line. The 2025 annual report and the immediate reports around it show that the base now exists. 2026 will decide whether it remains an impressive backlog story or finally becomes a real margin story.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.