Netanel Group: How Much Of Reported Project Surplus Is Actually Reachable
The annual report presents NIS 657.2 million of projected withdrawable surplus across the four material projects, but more than a quarter of that number is equity already invested or equity still to be injected. Before shareholders see that value, it has to pass through lenders, guarantees, cross-collateral, and in Atlit also a partner waterfall.
What This Follow-Up Is Isolating
The main article already argued that Netanel's real issue is not whether its projects are profitable, but whether those profits can actually climb up to the shareholder layer. This continuation takes the four material projects the company itself opened up in the annual report, Beitar Illit Phase A, Modiin, Atlit, and Karmi Gat, and asks what really sits inside the line called projected withdrawable surplus.
The first conclusion: projected withdrawable surplus is not another name for economic profit. Across these four projects, the company presents NIS 657.2 million of projected withdrawable surplus. But NIS 179.7 million of that amount is equity already invested or equity the company still has to inject before it can pull it back. More than a quarter of the headline number is therefore not new value at all. It is capital recovery, or capital that still has to go in first.
The second conclusion: even before lenders and partners enter the picture, the accounting gross profit in the project tables is more generous than the economic profit. Across the same four projects, expected accounting gross profit stands at NIS 604.7 million, while expected economic profit stands at NIS 477.5 million. The NIS 127.3 million gap comes from financing, marketing, and selling expenses that sit outside cost of sales. Anyone stopping at gross profit is reading a flattering version of the story.
The third conclusion: even the line already called projected withdrawable surplus still does not describe free cash. In Beitar, Modiin, and Atlit, surplus release is conditioned on full debt repayment, cancellation of Sale Law guarantees, the absence of credit lines, and lender consent. In Karmi Gat there is not yet a project-finance agreement at all. In Atlit there is also a partner waterfall: Netanel funds the equity alone until a certain point, its shareholder loans are repaid first, and the buyer has priority to reach a cumulative NIS 44 million if project surplus turns out weaker than expected.
What Actually Sits Inside The Surplus Line
| Project | Expected accounting gross profit | Expected economic profit | Equity already invested | Equity still to inject | Projected withdrawable surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beitar Illit Phase A | 249.5 | 206.5 | 47.4 | 0.0 | 253.9 |
| Modiin | 41.7 | 31.1 | 15.5 | 9.3 | 55.9 |
| Atlit | 144.2 | 125.2 | 25.6 | 0.0 | 150.9 |
| Karmi Gat | 169.4 | 114.6 | 36.7 | 45.2 | 196.5 |
This chart is the core of the created-value versus reachable-value gap. In Beitar and Atlit, most of the surplus line is economic profit, but even there part of the number is simply equity coming back. In Modiin and Karmi Gat the picture is sharper: 44.4% of Modiin's headline surplus and 41.7% of Karmi Gat's are equity already invested or equity still to be injected. In Karmi Gat alone, NIS 45.2 million of the headline number has not even gone into the project yet.
The second chart matters for the same reason. The blockage is not only at the lender-release stage. There is already a gap between accounting gross profit and the economics left after financing, marketing, and selling costs. In Karmi Gat that gap is NIS 54.8 million, about 32% of accounting gross profit. In Modiin it is NIS 10.6 million, roughly a quarter of the accounting number. Not every project profit that looks visible is actually available to be released.
| Layer | What it includes | What it still does not solve |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting gross profit | Revenue less cost of sales | Financing, marketing, and selling expenses |
| Economic profit | Profit after those non-cost-of-sales items | Equity recovery, lender release, guarantees, and partner terms |
| Projected withdrawable surplus | Economic profit plus equity expected to come back from the project | Release timing, lender conditions, and parent-level cash uses |
| Shareholder-reachable value | Only what is left after the bank, the partner, and the parent company | The report does not quantify this final layer precisely |
This is not semantics. When the company presents projected withdrawable surplus, it has already moved one step beyond gross profit, but it still has not shown how much of that number actually sits close to ordinary shareholders.
Project By Project: Where The Value Gets Stuck
Beitar Illit Phase A
This is the only one of the four projects that has already shown an actual pull of cash. The company presents NIS 253.9 million of projected withdrawable surplus for its share, and NIS 40 million has already been drawn, leaving NIS 213.9 million of projected surplus at the report date. That matters, because here there is at least proof that the move from project surplus to money actually drawn is not purely theoretical.
But even in Beitar, the NIS 213.9 million should not be read as cash waiting at the end of the pipe. First, NIS 47.4 million of the number is equity already invested. Second, release is only expected in 2027. Third, drawing the surplus is conditioned on full repayment of debts, full performance of obligations toward the lender, cancellation of all bank guarantees and Sale Law guarantees, the absence of any credit lines related to the project and even unrelated to the project, and lender consent.
So even in the project closest to proving accessibility, the surplus still sits behind a narrow exit gate. This is not a ring-fenced cash box. It is a structure where the bank controls the final valve.
Modiin
In Modiin, the company shows NIS 55.9 million of projected withdrawable surplus. On the surface that looks like a respectable number for an 88-unit project. But almost half of it, NIS 24.8 million, is equity already invested or equity that still has to go in. Economic profit itself is only NIS 31.1 million.
The more important point is the collateral structure. Modiin is financed by Yesodot A' Financing and Menora Mivtachim, and the report explicitly describes first-ranking cross-collateral between Modiin and Atlit. These are therefore not two fully separate cash pools. The release path of one is tied to the other.
Here too, surplus is only expected to be released at project completion, and only after full debt repayment, cancellation of Sale Law guarantees, no credit lines, and lender consent. So even if the planning side advances, the NIS 55.9 million is still not immediately reachable value. Netanel still has to inject another NIS 9.3 million of equity and then pass the lender gates.
Atlit
Atlit is the most interesting case because the project number and the shareholder number drift apart through the partner agreement. For the company's 50% share, the report shows NIS 150.9 million of projected withdrawable surplus against NIS 125.2 million of expected economic profit. On the face of the table that looks simple: half a project, half a surplus line.
In reality the waterfall is not straight. In November 2025 the sale of half of Nofi Atlit's shares to Michman Financing was completed, and Netanel itself undertook to provide the equity alone, if needed, until a building permit is obtained or the project-finance agreement becomes effective. That support is provided as shareholder loans from Netanel.
From that point the priority stack becomes material. Under the agreement, equity release and surplus distributions are first used to repay Netanel's shareholder loans. Only after that are surplus distributions split equally, and even then subject to a further condition: if the supervising appraiser's report shows that expected surplus will not be enough to let the buyer receive at least NIS 44 million cumulatively, the buyer gets priority in distributions until that threshold is met. In addition, once 85% of project execution and 85% of expected receipts are achieved, the buyer may elect to receive a final NIS 44 million out of surplus at that point, subject to lender consent.
That is the critical point. Even though the report shows NIS 150.9 million of projected withdrawable surplus for Netanel's share, the path of that money is not an automatic 50/50 split and not a clean straight line to shareholders. Anyone reading Atlit as just another half-share in a profitable project is missing the waterfall.
Karmi Gat
Karmi Gat carries the biggest number, NIS 196.5 million of projected withdrawable surplus, but also the biggest realization gap. Expected economic profit is NIS 114.6 million, and the balance includes NIS 36.7 million of equity already invested plus another NIS 45.2 million of equity still to be injected. In other words, about NIS 81.9 million, roughly 42% of the headline line, is capital rather than profit.
The practical problem is even sharper: as of year-end 2025 there was still no project-finance agreement for the project. The company holds a land loan from Bank Leumi at prime plus 1%, with principal due on September 30, 2026. As long as there is no project finance, there is no normal release mechanism for surplus either. In other words, the company is already presenting a surplus target, but at the report date the project still did not have the financing framework from which surplus could actually begin to be released.
That makes Karmi Gat the clearest example of how a large number on paper can mislead. This may well be a project with attractive economics, but before shareholders see reachable value, it still has to pass through permit, marketing, project finance, and additional equity injection. Here the surplus line describes a destination, not a cash drawer.
What We Can Know And What Still Stays Open
We can know that Netanel has real project-level value across these four projects, and that Beitar already proved that some of it can actually be released. We can also know that the company is relatively transparent in showing the bridge from accounting gross profit to economic profit and the equity component inside the surplus line.
But the report does not quantify how much of these surpluses will ultimately reach the ordinary-shareholder layer after parent-company cash uses, holding-company debt service, and the needs of other projects. So the right question is not how much surplus is presented, but how much of it can turn into free cash within a reasonable time, without first requiring more equity and without first getting trapped at the bank or partner level.
Conclusion
The bottom line is simple: Netanel does not lack reported project surplus. It has a gap between that number and value that can actually be extracted. Across the four material projects, the company presents NIS 657.2 million of projected withdrawable surplus, but NIS 179.7 million of it is capital coming back or capital still to be injected, NIS 127.3 million separates accounting gross profit from economic profit, and only in Beitar is there partial proof of an actual draw.
If this has to be compressed into one sentence, it is this: Netanel does not suffer from a shortage of projects with expected profit. It suffers from too many layers between reported project surplus and value that shareholders can actually reach.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.