Tondo Smart: Is Defense Already an Economic Engine or Still a Funded Project
Tondo's defense activity already delivered a higher gross margin than the civil segment in 2025 and won first validation from a second defense customer. But the economics still sit on top of capitalized development, Ministry of Defense funding, and concentration in a single anchor project, which makes it too early to call this a clean commercial engine.
Gross Profit Already Looks Like an Engine
The main article argued that defense is the reason Tondo looks different in 2025. This follow-up isolates the narrower question underneath that shift: has the company already built a standalone economic engine, or is it still benefiting from an anchor customer that is financing a meaningful part of the product and development leap?
For now, the answer is both. At the gross-profit level, something real is already there. The defense segment generated NIS 5.429 million of revenue and NIS 2.759 million of gross profit in 2025, a gross margin of about 50.8%. That is stronger than the civil segment, which stayed around 42.4%. So defense did not just add more revenue. It contributed about 24.4% of group sales and about 27.9% of group gross profit.
But that is exactly where the read has to slow down. The segment disclosure stops at gross profit and explicitly says it does not include identifiable segment assets or liabilities. In other words, the 50.8% number is good evidence of early economic quality, but it is not yet evidence of full segment operating profitability, capital intensity, or return on the development layer built around it.
| Economic layer | Figure | What it really means |
|---|---|---|
| Defense segment revenue in 2025 | NIS 5.429 million | There is real commercial volume here, not just a pilot |
| Segment gross profit | NIS 2.759 million | Defense is already improving group profit quality |
| Gross margin | 50.8% | Better than the civil segment, but still not the same as operating profit |
| Development costs capitalized in 2025 | NIS 1.125 million | Part of building the product did not run through current expense |
| R&D costs reclassified into cost of sales | NIS 1.735 million | Another part did run through the P&L because revenue was recognized against development milestones |
| Defense backlog | NIS 5.3 million at end-2025, NIS 6.2 million at 10 March 2026 | There is continuity, but still around the same activity axis |
The implication is that defense has already moved beyond the story stage, but not yet beyond the full-proof stage. This is already more than an experiment, but not yet an engine that clearly stands on its own.
Where the Line Runs Between Product and Funded Development
The Ministry of Defense agreement was built from the start as something broader than a normal supply contract. In January 2025 Tondo entered into a strategic agreement to develop sensors with detection, monitoring, and alert capabilities for low-altitude airspace, based on the technology infrastructure it had already deployed across Israel. The IP developed under the project remains with the company, but the Ministry receives an unlimited license to use the project outputs for its own needs, and the company may sell those outputs to other customers only subject to royalty payments to the Ministry up to a contractual cap.
That matters because it defines the product economics from day one. The company is not simply selling an existing finished unit. It is building a new product layer together with an anchor customer, while that same customer keeps both unlimited-use rights and a claim on part of the future upside through the royalty mechanism. This is not pure off-the-shelf product economics.
The way 2025 was recorded strengthens that reading. In the intangible-assets note, the company says that during 2025 all conditions were met to capitalize development costs for the sensors developed under the Ministry of Defense agreement, and it capitalized NIS 1.125 million. At the same time, in the R&D expense note, it says NIS 1.735 million of R&D costs tied to development milestones in the Ministry project were reclassified into cost of sales because revenue was recognized against them.
That is a critical point. Part of the development flowed through the P&L, another part stayed on the balance sheet as an intangible asset, and an additional layer was expanded in August 2025 with full Ministry funding. The 16 March 2026 update says the latest budget expansion was meant mainly to widen system deployment, but also to add development budget for upgraded system capabilities. So 2025 was not just a year of defense sales. It was also a year in which sales, funded development, and capitalized development all sat inside the same economic story.
That leads to the most important conclusion of this follow-up: the defense segment's 50.8% gross margin does not yet prove what its end-state economics will look like once the joint development phase is over. It does prove there is a product with real commercial potential. It does not yet prove what will be left for the company when full customer funding gives way to repeat product sales, support layers, and royalties owed back to the Ministry.
The Second Customer Changes the Direction, but Not Yet the Revenue Base
The positive news is that defense no longer sits only on the Ministry of Defense. In August 2025 Tondo received a first order from a leading Israeli defense company for the sky-monitoring sensors developed for the Ministry project, at about NIS 2.1 million. By February 2026 the company had already reported a major milestone completed at a cumulative value of about NIS 1.5 million, roughly 70% of a project then estimated at about NIS 2.2 million.
That matters a great deal, because this is where the shift from funded development toward outside commercialization begins. If a product built around an anchor customer starts being sold to another defense customer, then it is not just a one-client custom solution.
But the accounting still requires precision. At the cutoff date, the company had recognized a contract liability of NIS 1.3 million in connection with the second defense customer. At the same time, 2025 defense segment revenue of NIS 5.429 million was almost identical to the NIS 5.4 million the company says it recognized from the Ministry of Defense project. That closeness suggests the second defense customer had not yet made a material contribution to recognized revenue by year-end 2025. So there is already a second commercial validation, but it is not yet sitting meaningfully in the reported revenue line.
That is the exact boundary between a correct strategic direction and a stable economic base. A second customer proves the product can be sold. It does not yet prove Tondo has built broad, repeatable demand. To prove that, the second order has to turn into meaningful recognized revenue, and then be followed by another customer, another project, or another order layer that does not sit on the same funded-development mechanism again.
The Budget Expansion Shows Progress, and Also Why the Project Is Still the Center of Gravity
After the balance-sheet date, the company received two positive signals from the Ministry of Defense. First, on 23 February 2026, it reported an additional order and an increase in total project budget to about NIS 9 million. Then, on 16 March 2026, it reported a further budget expansion in an amount expected to reach about NIS 2 million, mainly for wider system deployment and an added development budget to upgrade system capabilities. At the same time, defense backlog rose from NIS 5.3 million at end-2025 to NIS 6.2 million at 10 March 2026.
That is clearly positive. The Ministry is not just funding the project. It is expanding it based on indications from the field performance of the systems already deployed. Commercially, that is an important quality signal. There is a product here that earns more budget after deployment, not only before it.
But even this positive signal still belongs to the same concentrated economic frame. The February and March budget expansions rest on the same customer, the same project, and the same transition from development into operational deployment. Even in the company's own language, the discussions relate to moving the project into an operational phase and to the budget implications of that move. This is still the story of one project deepening, not yet of a market spreading out horizontally.
So the real distinction is not between demand and no demand. Demand is already there. The distinction is between demand that keeps deepening inside one anchor-customer project and demand that is already becoming a repeatable commercial layer. As of mid-March 2026, Tondo still sits closer to the first description.
So What Is It Right Now, an Engine or a Funded Project
As of year-end 2025 and the developments disclosed through 16 March 2026, Tondo's defense activity has already moved beyond the option stage. It is generating strong gross profit, has won a first validation from an additional defense customer, and keeps receiving budget expansions tied to field performance. This is no longer just a promise.
But economically, it is still closer to a funded project with emerging commercialization than to a fully commercial engine. The reason is straightforward. Current profitability sits alongside capitalized development, development fully funded by the Ministry of Defense, a royalty obligation on future sales, and segment disclosure that still stops at gross profit.
For the balance to flip decisively toward an economic engine, three things need to happen together:
- The second defense customer has to move from contract liability into meaningful recognized revenue, and ideally not remain alone.
- The segment has to show that its margin stays high even when joint development gives way to normal sales, service, and support.
- Defense growth has to begin coming from customers and orders outside the same anchor project, not only from bigger budget rounds inside it.
Until that happens, the most accurate description is that Tondo has already proved it has a defense product with a market and with margin, but has not yet proved that this market stands on broad enough commercial legs to carry the segment's economics on its own.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.