Veloryx follow-up: what is left of AQ150 and the monetization path for the engine platform
Veloryx's engine activity did not disappear, but by the end of 2025 it rested on AQ150 in internal run-in, a first pilot expected only in the second quarter of 2026, and a monetization path that now requires third-party capital or a sale of the activity. This is no longer a self-funded growth story. It is a value-extraction story from a technology platform that still has not crossed commercial proof.
The main article already established that Veloryx's center of gravity has moved to HLS. This follow-up isolates what was left behind: AQ150 and the engine platform are no longer the story of a company trying to build its next growth engine internally. They are now the story of an asset searching for an exit path to value.
That distinction matters. In the older version of the story, AQ150 was supposed to become an in-house engine of production, sales, and margin. In the annual report and the presentation, the company is already framing it differently: success now depends on a third party that will fund the move to serial production, inject capital until commercialization, and then either pay royalties if commercialization works or acquire the activity outright. In other words, what remains for shareholders is not an internal manufacturing option. It is a transaction option.
AQ150 did not vanish. In January 2025 the company started manufacturing the engine, and by the report date a generator based on it was still in run-in at the company's site in Poland. But the company now estimates the first pilot only in the second quarter of 2026. There is no backlog, and at the report date the company is not even carrying out marketing and distribution activity for its products. It is focused on run-in ahead of pilots. That is the key point: there is a product, but there is still no customer proof.
That chart matters not because the company stopped investing, but because it shows a change in character. Net R&D spending fell to $8.1 million in 2025 from $9.5 million in 2024, and the company explicitly says that spending on AQ150 was higher than spending on the linear engine. So even inside the engine platform there is now a hierarchy: AQ150 remains the only engine still being pushed forward, while the linear engine has moved backward.
Where AQ150 Actually Stands
AQ150 still sits in the middle, not at the commercial end point. On one hand, this is no longer only a concept slide. The company defines it as the core of its modular distributed-power system for the EV and data-center markets, and it lays out advantages in size, weight, efficiency, and modularity. On the other hand, what holds the thesis now is not a spec-sheet comparison against peers. It is whether the product will work at a real customer site and meet the KPI commitments the company has made.
The report gives a clear sequence. AQ150 manufacturing started in January 2025. By the report date the AQ150-based Genset system was still in run-in in Poland. The company estimates the first pilot in the second quarter of 2026. That means the company spent all of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026 without making a real transition from internal run-in to external proof.
Production capacity shows the same bottleneck. The company estimates that in the early stages it will be able to produce only up to low tens of units per year in Poland, and even that is subject to relatively simple adjustments to the current site. To move to serial production it explicitly says subcontractors will be needed. So AQ150 is not stuck only on technology. It is stuck on the bridge from engineering to industrialization and supply chain.
| Check point | What exists today | What is still missing |
|---|---|---|
| AQ150 | Manufacturing started in January 2025, system in run-in in Poland | Qualified pilot at a customer site, KPI achievement |
| Commercial go-to-market | No marketing and distribution activity at the report date | Active commercial channel and customer conversion |
| Production capacity | Up to low tens of units per year in the current Poland setup | Subcontractors and serial-production transition |
| Signed demand | Four 2024 MOUs with EnviroCharge | Order, backlog, or binding contract |
The Platform Is No Longer Built As One Growth Engine
What remains of the engine platform is no longer a basket of products moving at the same pace. The company itself says the continued development of the linear engine moved to lower priority, and that for strategic and budget reasons it stopped the development of the generator based on it. Instead, the current intention is to grant a development and manufacturing license to companies that may be interested.
That is not a side comment. It means the older layer of the story has already moved out of the self-commercialization track and into a licensing track. AQ150 remains the more active path, but even that path is no longer built as a business line the company plans to fund by itself all the way to the finish line.
That is why the lower R&D bill does not tell a story of convergence to profitability. It tells a story of narrowing and survival. The company reduced the width of the program, concentrated more resources on AQ150, and left the linear engine as a technology that might be licensed out. That is a rational capital-discipline move, but it also makes clear that the company no longer sees the platform as a broad organic growth engine.
The Monetization Path The Company Itself Describes
The most important part of the filing is that the company is no longer presenting commercialization as something it will finance alone. In both the annual report and the presentation it writes that a critical success factor is an agreement with a third party, such as a strategic investor or industrial partner, under a financing and cooperation structure that will enable the move from development to serial production. That third party is supposed to fund production infrastructure, equipment, certifications, tests, and regulatory approvals, in exchange for an economic structure based on royalties to the company in the event of commercialization and or a sale of the activity.
The economic meaning is straightforward: AQ150 may still create value, but the path to that value is no longer purely operational. It is a financing and industrial transaction. Without a third party, the company is effectively admitting that it does not have the full route to serial production.
The company also took a concrete step in that direction. On January 29, 2026 it signed a brokerage commission agreement with former CEO Amit Birk, under which, if he finds a buyer for the engine activity and a binding purchase agreement is signed, he will keep assisting the parties and the company will pay him $350 thousand plus VAT in 10 monthly installments. That does not prove a buyer will be found. It does prove that a sale of the activity is already on the working table, not only on a strategy slide.
Where The Path Actually Got Stuck
To understand why the company moved to the language of royalties or sale, the reader needs to look at the customer path. In December 2024 the company signed four MOUs with EnviroCharge for pilots in the United States. On paper, that is exactly how a technology like this is supposed to advance. But in November 2025 EnviroCharge informed the company that, because of delays on the company's side relative to the pilot timetable, it would need to review alternatives for its own activity. After that, it only said that once the system is ready it would be willing to consider a POC for the system, subject to the KPI the company had committed to.
That is a material downgrade. The path moved from four planned pilots to a far more conditional framework: first the system must be ready, then the KPI must be met, and only then a POC can be examined. So anyone trying to read this as near-term commercialization needs to stay careful. The customer did not disappear, but it is also no longer waiting unconditionally.
The broader commercialization pipe looks weak as well. The company mentions a non-exclusive global representation agreement with Green Cougar for the marketing, distribution, and sale of solutions based on both the linear engine and AQ150, but then adds that, to the best of its knowledge, the marketer has stopped acting under the agreement and that it does not expect the activity under that agreement to lead to potential customer engagements. In other words, even the oldest commercialization pipe no longer looks like a practical route.
Royalties Versus Sale: What Is Left For Shareholders
The company is effectively presenting two possible routes, and each tells a different economic story to shareholders.
| Route | What has to happen first | What shareholders may get | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Royalties | Pilot, KPI achievement, third-party capital injection, serial-production transition, sales | Continuing participation if the engines are actually sold | Long chain of milestones and dependence on someone else's execution |
| Sale of the activity | Buyer identification and binding agreement | Faster crystallization of value if a deal is signed | Deal would likely be priced before full market proof and without an existing backlog |
That table explains why the option still exists but has become narrower. The royalty route theoretically preserves longer upside, but it also requires the highest number of jumps: pilot, KPI, funding partner, industrialization, sales. The sale route is shorter, but it may lock in value at a weaker point on the curve, with no backlog, no active go-to-market engine, and no full customer proof.
This is also where another number from the annual report matters. The company says about $70 million has been invested in the activity since inception. After that kind of sunk investment, the fact that the current path is to find a third party or a buyer means the remaining value is not operating value that is immediately reachable by shareholders. It is value that still depends on somebody else taking the final layer of risk.
Conclusion
AQ150 has not been taken off the table, but it is no longer sitting at the center of the room. What remains is a real technology asset, with manufacturing already started, active run-in, patents, and engineering teams in Germany and Poland. What also remains is a clear gap between a technology asset and a business that can be commercialized from inside the company.
So the right question for Veloryx is no longer whether the engine looks good on paper. The question is whether, over the coming year, it can clear one stage it still has not cleared: enough commercial proof to make a third party fund the jump to serial production, or enough buyer interest to make a purchaser pay for the activity at a level that returns something to public shareholders. Until that happens, the engine platform remains a transaction option, not an earnings engine.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.