Brimag Digital: What Actually Reaches Shareholders from Ishpar, Elit, and Brener
This follow-up separates the accounting value of Ishpar, Elit, and Brener from the cash that actually moves up into Brimag. Ishpar behaves like a real payout engine, Elit still sends cash upstream while book value weakens, and Brener remains, for now, a high-carrying-value asset with very little current distribution.
What This Follow-up Is Isolating
The main article showed that Brimag's consolidated numbers mix two very different layers: a working-capital-heavy import and distribution business, and a holding layer whose economics should be read differently. This continuation narrows the lens to one question only: what from Ishpar, Elit, and Brener actually moves up into Brimag, and can therefore matter for Brimag shareholders.
That requires a stricter cash test. In this piece, "what reaches shareholders" does not mean equity-accounted earnings left inside an associate. It means what actually reaches Brimag as dividends, management fees, or disclosed interest. Once that filter is applied, the three holdings stop looking alike. Ishpar is a genuine cash-remitting asset, Elit still sends cash upstream but alongside weaker book economics, and Brener is, at this stage, mostly a balance-sheet asset whose value is not yet showing up in distributions.
There is also a good reason not to read this layer through a single line item. The consolidated cash-flow statement shows ILS 6.1 million of dividends received from held companies in 2025, but the holding-level disclosures present a more decomposed picture by asset and by type of inflow, without a simple one-line bridge between the two views. The only sensible way to read this layer is therefore holding by holding.
The Look-Through Map
| Holding | Brimag ownership | Carrying value at December 31, 2025 | 2025 profit or loss at the held-company level | What reached Brimag in 2025 | What reached Brimag after year-end | Economic read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ishpar | 50% | ILS 63.0 million | Net profit of ILS 12.9 million | ILS 5.1 million dividend and ILS 0.5 million management fee | ILS 0.3 million dividend and ILS 0.06 million management fee | A holding that converts economics into real cash |
| Elit | 50% | ILS 17.8 million | Net loss of ILS 3.2 million | ILS 2.6 million dividend and ILS 0.4 million management fee | ILS 1.44 million dividend and ILS 0.08 million management fee | Cash still moves upstream, but value quality is weaker |
| Brener, through Smied | 50% in Brener through 100% in Smied | ILS 90.7 million | Net profit of ILS 1.93 million | ILS 0.12 million management fee and ILS 0.19 million interest, with no dividend | ILS 0.03 million management fee | A lot of carrying value, very little current cash access |
That chart tells the story in one glance. Most of the upstream cash came from Ishpar. Elit still contributed a meaningful stream, but with much less quality. The Brener layer contributed almost no current liquidity to the listed parent despite a very large carrying value on the balance sheet.
This is the gap between accounting and cash. Brimag's 2025 equity-method line was only about ILS 2.6 million, but that net figure hides three very different engines: Ishpar added value, Elit subtracted it, and Brener added only a small amount. Anyone reading only the single associate-income line will miss who actually carries the holding layer.
Ishpar, the Cash Actually Travels Up
Ishpar is the cleanest example of value that becomes usable cash. It ended 2025 with net profit of ILS 12.9 million, comprehensive income of ILS 13.2 million, and operating cash flow of ILS 35.9 million. At the same time, it paid ILS 10.1 million of dividends to its shareholders in 2025, reduced short-term bank debt by ILS 22.1 million, and finished the year with only ILS 2.389 million of cash on hand.
That low year-end cash balance can look weak at first glance. The cash-flow statement changes the read. Ishpar did not fund its payout by taking on more leverage. It did the opposite. It funded the payout out of strong operating cash flow while cutting short-term debt. From Brimag's point of view, this is what a genuine remitting holding looks like.
At the Brimag level, the numbers reinforce that view. In 2025 Ishpar paid Brimag ILS 5.05 million of dividends, and Brimag also recorded ILS 0.5 million of management fees from Ishpar. After the balance-sheet date, in February 2026, Ishpar paid another ILS 0.3 million dividend to Brimag, and another ILS 0.06 million of management fees was disclosed after the balance-sheet date. Even under a narrow upstream-cash test, Ishpar is the main and cleanest engine in the holding layer.
The key point is not only the cash stream, but the relationship between that stream and the balance-sheet value. Brimag's carrying value in Ishpar stood at ILS 63.0 million at year-end. Half of Ishpar's equity was ILS 62.7 million at the same date, and the gap between the two is minimal. This is the holding where accounting value, earnings, and distribution still largely speak the same language.
The yellow flag here is not around asset quality. It is around payout pace. Ishpar paid out a meaningful dividend and still ended the year with a very low cash balance. So if Brimag wants to keep leaning on Ishpar as a distribution source, Ishpar will need to keep producing strong operating cash in 2026, not just decent accounting earnings.
Elit, Cash Upstream, Book Value Down
Elit is almost the opposite case. At the cash level it does not look weak. In 2025 it generated ILS 18.2 million of operating cash flow, paid Brimag ILS 2.643 million of dividends, and Brimag recorded another ILS 0.4 million of management fees from Elit. After year-end, in January and March 2026, Elit paid Brimag another ILS 1.437 million of dividends, and another ILS 0.08 million of management fees was disclosed after the balance-sheet date.
At the book-value level, though, 2025 was materially weaker. Elit ended the year with revenue of ILS 427.4 million, operating profit of ILS 7.2 million, and a net loss of ILS 3.159 million. Brimag's share of Elit's net loss came to ILS 3.803 million, and its share of comprehensive loss came to ILS 4.968 million. At the same time, the Georgian lari weakened by 10.42% against the shekel during 2025. Brimag's carrying value in Elit therefore fell to ILS 17.8 million.
That is the critical point, because it explains why current dividends should not be mistaken for clean value creation. Elit still sent cash upstream, but it did not do so out of a strong earnings year or a stronger translated value base. Brimag received cash while the investment itself weakened in the accounts.
The shareholder agreement adds another important layer. It requires Elit to adopt a dividend policy of at least 50% of profits annually, subject to law. That helps explain why Elit has a visible route for upstreaming cash. But 2025 also shows why payout policy alone is not enough to assess economic quality. Cash can still come up in a year when profitability weakens and the local currency works against the Israeli shareholder.
So Elit is a middle-layer holding. It is not a trapped-value asset like Brener, but it is not a clean payout engine like Ishpar either. Read only through the dividend, it looks too optimistic. Read only through the loss and translation pressure, it looks too pessimistic. The right read is that this is still a cash-remitting asset, but one with much higher volatility and much less stable value quality.
Brener, a Lot of Balance-Sheet Value and Almost No Cash Upstream
Brener is where a surface read becomes dangerous. In Brimag's accounts it looks very large, because the carrying value of the investment stood at ILS 90.724 million at year-end 2025. But at the level of current operating results, this is a much smaller entity. In 2025 Brener generated ILS 5.923 million of revenue and ILS 1.93 million of net profit, so Brimag's share of comprehensive income was only ILS 0.965 million.
This is the core of the story. Brener currently sends almost no cash up the chain. In the parent-level disclosure of income from held companies, there is no dividend from Brener or Smied in 2025. The only cash-like streams disclosed from that layer are ILS 0.12 million of management fees and ILS 0.19 million of interest, plus another ILS 0.03 million of management fees after the balance-sheet date.
In other words, Brener is currently an asset spoken for in valuation terms, not in distribution terms. Even Brener's own equity stood at only ILS 25.733 million at year-end on a 100% basis, so Brimag's half-share of that accounting equity is only about ILS 12.9 million. The ILS 90.7 million carrying value reflects recorded acquisition cost and premium rather than current-year distributable cash. There is no accounting contradiction here. It is simply a logistics real-estate layer that remains far from the definition of accessible shareholder cash.
The separate-company investment schedule sharpens that point further. In the Smied layer through which Brener is held, there was still ILS 6.149 million of loan balance outstanding at year-end, and the footnote tied to that line also points to shareholder loans granted into Brener. The right read, then, is that Brimag is still supporting this layer with capital and loans rather than harvesting regular distributions from it.
That is the chart to keep in mind when thinking about Brimag's holding layer. Ishpar shows a reasonable relationship between balance-sheet value and current upstream cash. Elit already shows a wider gap. Brener shows an extreme one. Anyone looking for current liquidity cannot read the three holdings as if they were economically interchangeable.
What Can Really Be Counted for Shareholders
If the holding layer is added up only by what actually moved into Brimag in 2025, the figure is about ILS 8.9 million: roughly ILS 5.6 million from Ishpar, ILS 3.0 million from Elit, and only ILS 0.31 million from the Brener path through Smied. That is a far more useful figure for a shareholder than the question of how much equity-method income was recorded on the consolidated statement.
It also explains why Brimag's own shareholder distribution is not funded by these holdings alone. In 2025 Brimag paid ILS 12.0 million of dividends to its own shareholders. Even if all dividends, management fees, and interest that came up from the three holdings are attributed to the holding layer, that layer still did not fund the public dividend on its own. The same logic holds after year-end: the disclosures from Ishpar, Elit, and Smied add up to only about ILS 1.9 million after the balance-sheet date, while Brimag itself approved a gross dividend of ILS 13.5 million at the end of March 2026.
That does not mean Brimag's dividend is inherently problematic. It means something simpler and more important: anyone trying to assess Brimag's distribution capacity cannot treat the entire holding layer as one clean and automatic source of cash. Ishpar is close to that definition. Elit supports it only partially, and with much more noise. Brener is not there yet.
Conclusion
The look-through picture is sharp. Ishpar is the only holding that in 2025 generated profit, generated cash, and sent cash to Brimag at a pace that looks genuinely distributable. Elit still sends cash upstream, but does so alongside book-value erosion, which makes it less clean and less predictable. Brener, despite a very large carrying value, still translates into almost no liquidity for Brimag and its shareholders.
This is not a side note. It changes how the entire holding layer should be read. Brimag does not own three similar holdings. It owns one real payout engine, one mixed-quality cash source, and one long-duration asset whose value is still remote from current distributions. Anyone who does not separate them will misread earnings quality, cash quality, and the share of balance-sheet value that is actually accessible to shareholders today.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.