Pegasus Is the New Core: How Much Value Really Reaches Kishrei Teufa
Kishrei Teufa’s move to 83% ownership in Pegasus materially improved its access to upstream dividends, but that still does not mean Pegasus’s full modeled value reaches the parent’s shareholders. The valuation report gives Pegasus a value far above its carrying amount, yet that value still rests on recovery assumptions and a negative working-capital model that explain why economic value and accessible cash are not the same thing.
What This Follow-up Isolates
The main article argued that Pegasus is no longer just a nicer segment inside Kishrei Teufa. It has become the group’s main profit and dividend engine. This follow-up isolates a different question: how much of that value really travels upstream, and how much of it still sits inside model value, goodwill, or liquidity that the business itself still needs.
The short answer is fairly sharp. Buying another 33% of Pegasus in March 2025 improved access to value in a real way. From here, every Pegasus distribution sends more cash to Kishrei Teufa and less to minorities. But moving from 50.01% to 83% does not turn Pegasus into a 100%-owned cash box, does not eliminate the remaining 17% minority, and does not turn a NIS 131.9 million valuation into cash already sitting in the parent’s pocket.
That is the point worth separating. Pegasus carries real value, but it also carries real friction. A reader who looks only at the valuation line may overstate the case. A reader who focuses only on the minority and the trapped cash may miss a deal that did materially improve the upstream value path.
The Deal Shortened the Dividend Pipe
Note 11 lays out a transaction that looks technical in form but large in consequence. On January 5, 2025, Pegasus Holdings exercised its put option over another 33% of Pegasus, and on March 27, 2025, Kishrei Teufa paid NIS 24.378 million, about $6.6 million, and moved to 83% ownership.
The immediate economic meaning is not just more control. It is another 32.99 percentage points of every future dividend. That sounds mechanical, but it is exactly the difference between a subsidiary that creates value and a subsidiary that can actually move more of that value up to the listed parent.
In 2025, Kishrei Teufa received $2.082 million of dividends from Pegasus. After the balance-sheet date, on March 26, 2026, Pegasus distributed $2.6 million to its shareholders. Under the new ownership structure, Kishrei Teufa’s share of a distribution like that is about $2.16 million, while the minority share is about $0.44 million. Under the old 50.01% structure, the same distribution would have sent only about $1.30 million to Kishrei Teufa. The gap, about $0.86 million on one distribution, is the practical value of shortening the pipe.
| Item | Before the put | After the put | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kishrei Teufa ownership | 50.01% | 83% | More value moves upstream from every future distribution |
| Minority ownership | 49.99% | 17% | The friction is much smaller, but it is still there |
| Cash paid | Not relevant | NIS 24.378 million | Real cash spent in order to buy stronger access to dividends |
| A $2.6 million distribution | About $1.30 million to the parent | About $2.16 million to the parent | Roughly $0.86 million more to Kishrei Teufa on one payout |
The key point is that the deal did not create value inside Pegasus from scratch. It changed who benefits from it. After the exercise, Pegasus remains its own business, but a larger share of distributed earnings stops leaking to minorities and flows to Kishrei Teufa instead.
The Price Paid Looks Expensive Against Book, Cheap Against the Model
This is where the story gets more interesting. The Pegasus valuation report used for goodwill impairment testing gives the business a value of NIS 131.863 million as of December 31, 2025. In the same work, Pegasus’s carrying amount in Kishrei Teufa’s books stands at NIS 44.540 million.
If we translate that into the 33% slice that was actually acquired, the picture becomes two-sided:
| Reference point | 100% of Pegasus | 33% of Pegasus | The right reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount in the books | NIS 44.540 million | NIS 14.698 million | The accounting value layer |
| Cash price paid in March 2025 | Not relevant | NIS 24.378 million | What Kishrei Teufa actually spent |
| Business value in the valuation report | NIS 131.863 million | NIS 43.515 million | The model-based economic value layer |
That is exactly why the deal can look different from every angle. Against the books, Kishrei Teufa paid roughly 1.66 times the carrying-value slice. Against the economic model used to support the goodwill line, it paid only about 56% of the implied value of that same block.
That leads to an important conclusion. On paper, the minority buyout looks attractive. But it matters what sits behind the NIS 131.9 million valuation. This is not a market transaction. It is an impairment-support valuation built on recovery assumptions.
| Key model assumption | The figure | Why it matters for shareholder access |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 net revenue | NIS 35.9 million | A 58.7% jump versus 2025, so the model assumes a sharp recovery |
| Return to 2019 scale | In 2028 | The model does not assume instant normalization, but it does assume a fairly clear recovery path |
| Discount rate | 16.9% | Risk is already set high, so a strong valuation still implies meaningful cash-generation expectations |
| Pre-tax discount rate | 21.2% | A reminder that the base case is not a soft one |
| Terminal growth | 2.5% | Part of the value sits in the long tail, not just in 2026 |
| Working-capital profile | Negative 85% in 2025 and about negative 48% on average in the forecast years | Part of the cash-generation story depends on a business model funded in advance by customers |
So the right way to read the transaction is this: the minority block was bought at a price that looks high against the accounting layer, but low against the value layer the company itself uses to defend the goodwill. That helps the thesis, but it does not remove the need to test whether the model actually holds.
Accessible Dividends Are Not the Same as Economic Value
This is the distinction shareholders can easily miss. The valuation report asks what Pegasus is worth as a going concern. Kishrei Teufa shareholders need to ask a different question: how much of that value can actually turn into upstream dividends without damaging the engine itself.
Appendix A of the valuation report shows Pegasus ending 2025 with NIS 14.044 million of cash and cash equivalents and another NIS 37.919 million of marketable securities. At first glance, that looks like a balance sheet that should be able to distribute aggressively. But the same appendix also shows NIS 63.384 million of other payables and accruals, plus NIS 7.798 million owed to suppliers, airlines, and post-dated checks. And that is before looking at the model’s own starting point: structurally negative working capital, which fits an organized-tour model where customers pay before the trip takes place.
In other words, part of Pegasus’s liquidity is not “surplus cash” in the way a holding-company investor might hope. It is operating float. That is why real dividends matter more here than accounting value or gross cash on the balance sheet. The $2.082 million received in 2025 and the $2.6 million distribution in March 2026 prove that there is a real upstream path. But they also remind the reader that this path still runs through operating discipline, seasonality, and the company’s ability to preserve negative working capital without starving the business.
That is the heart of the issue. Even after the minority buyout, every shekel of Pegasus value still has to pass through three filters before it becomes accessible value for Kishrei Teufa shareholders: first it must stay inside the business after operating needs, then it has to be distributed, and only then does 83% of it reach the parent.
Goodwill Makes Pegasus a Balance-Sheet Story, Not Only an Operating Story
Note 15 makes clear how central Pegasus has become to the group’s value structure. Out of total goodwill of $23.790 million, $21.601 million is allocated to Pegasus. That is about 91% of the group’s goodwill. It is also roughly 78% of Kishrei Teufa’s attributable equity at year-end 2025.
This is not a side note. It means the Pegasus question is no longer only whether another dividend will be paid. It is also whether the valuation model supporting the goodwill line will keep holding.
There are two messages here, and both matter. On the one hand, the cushion in the model looks substantial. Both the impairment note and the valuation work show recoverable value far above carrying amount. In the valuation sensitivity table, even when the discount rate rises to 17.9% or terminal growth drops to 1.5%, the value still remains in a range of about NIS 116 million to NIS 124 million, well above the NIS 44.540 million carrying amount.
On the other hand, both Note 15 and the valuation report say explicitly that the effects of the Sha'agat HaAri event were not included because the event occurred after the valuation date. So the apparent cushion should not be treated as untouchable. It is large, but it is also built on a forecast that starts 2026 with NIS 35.9 million of net revenue, NIS 8.6 million of operating expenses, and a gradual return to 2019 scale by 2028. If those assumptions move, the goodwill layer moves with them.
That is exactly why Pegasus is now both the group’s main value engine and its main balance-sheet risk concentration. When the unit performs, more value reaches the parent. If it disappoints, the damage does not stay inside a segment-profit line. It can reach the center of the equity story.
The Bottom Line
Buying the minority in Pegasus genuinely improved Kishrei Teufa’s access to value. This is not a vague statement about “greater control.” It is a real increase of nearly 33 percentage points in every future dividend, and the March 2026 distribution shows the practical effect very clearly.
But that still does not mean Pegasus’s full value has already moved upstream. The remaining 17% minority is still there, part of Pegasus’s liquidity still funds working capital rather than distributions, and almost the entire goodwill layer of the group still sits on a valuation model that did not incorporate the 2026 shock.
The right thesis now is not simply that Pegasus is worth a lot. The right thesis is that Pegasus has become an asset with much better parent-level access, but the value that is actually accessible to Kishrei Teufa shareholders is still lower than the full value that the model assigns to Pegasus itself. Anyone trying to judge how much value really reaches the parent now needs to measure not only Pegasus’s profit, but also the pace of distributions, the resilience of its working-capital model, and the ability to preserve goodwill value once 2026 reality enters the assumptions.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.