Ralko: Customer Credit and the Gap Between Profit and Cash
The main article already showed that financing became the real story at Ralko. This follow-up isolates the mechanism: receivables and inventory grew, supplier credit shrank, card slips still had to be discounted, and dividends left only NIS 282 thousand of cash at the end of 2025.
Where The Gap Actually Opened
The main article already argued that Ralko's bottleneck in 2025 was financing, not brand relevance. This follow-up isolates the more precise point: how a year that ended with NIS 24.8 million of net profit and NIS 17.3 million of operating cash flow still finished with only NIS 282 thousand of cash on hand.
That is the right question because the balance sheet does not look stressed on a superficial read. The current ratio slipped only to 2.5 from 2.6, the quick ratio to 1.5 from 1.6, and equity as a share of the balance sheet stood at 60%. On paper, this is not a company that looks close to the wall. In practice, year-end cash was almost zero, against NIS 83.95 million of receivables, NIS 66.27 million of inventory, NIS 28.73 million of short-term bank debt, and NIS 54.41 million of discounted card slips.
The right framework here is all-in cash flexibility rather than a headline liquidity ratio. Once the year is read that way, the mechanism is obvious: Ralko remained profitable, but the cash stayed trapped in customers and inventory, part of supplier credit receded, and shareholder distributions took more out of the system than the operating cycle released.
| Metric | 2024 | 2025 | What it really says |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 2.6 | 2.5 | No immediate accounting liquidity stress |
| Quick ratio | 1.6 | 1.5 | Even excluding inventory, the balance sheet still looks fine |
| Cash and cash equivalents | NIS 3.81 million | NIS 0.28 million | The cash cushion almost disappeared |
| Short-term bank debt | NIS 17.97 million | NIS 28.73 million | The bank had to finance a larger part of the cycle |
That chart captures the core of the continuation thesis. Ralko did not lose cash because of a large capex plan or a one-off project. It lost part of its cash conversion inside the most sensitive triangle for an importer and distributor: customers, inventory, and suppliers.
Customer Credit: Not Just Large, But Concentrated
Ralko's receivables line is first and foremost a financing layer. Gross receivables rose to NIS 94.93 million from NIS 88.61 million, while net receivables increased to NIS 83.95 million from NIS 77.64 million. At the same time, days sales outstanding rose to 95.7 from 90.1, even though the average credit period on goods sales is described as roughly 90 days. In other words, the cycle slowed.
What matters is that the expected credit-loss allowance did not move. It stayed at NIS 10.978 million, exactly where it was at the end of 2024. That is an important clue. This is not a story of a receivables book suddenly blowing up. It is a story of scale and concentration in customer credit becoming heavier for the cash cycle.
The concentration is hard to dismiss. Mahsanei Hashmal is a customer representing more than 20% of revenue, and sales to Customer A came to NIS 62.17 million in 2025 after NIS 72.52 million in 2024. Separately, one major customer accounted for 50% of year-end receivables, versus 53% a year earlier. Even without fusing those two disclosures into a stronger statement than the filing itself makes, the direction is clear: a meaningful part of both sales flow and collection flow sits with very few hands.
| Focus | 2024 | 2025 | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net receivables | NIS 77.64 million | NIS 83.95 million | More capital remained outside the cash balance |
| DSO | 90.1 | 95.7 | Collections stretched by another 5.6 days |
| Share of receivables held by one major customer | 53% | 50% | Concentration eased slightly, but remained extreme |
| Sales to Customer A | NIS 72.52 million | NIS 62.17 million | One large customer still matters materially to turnover |
| Expected credit-loss allowance | NIS 10.98 million | NIS 10.98 million | No sign of broad deterioration in credit quality |
This matters even more because the company does not insure its trade receivables. Any collection slowdown or tougher commercial stance from a large retail chain does not stop with an insurer. It falls directly on working capital, on the pace of bank usage, and on the need to sell card-related receivables forward.
Put simply, if Ralko sells well but waits longer for the money, the transaction is not truly complete from a cash perspective. Accounting profit is being booked before liquidity is actually released.
When Supplier Credit Retreats, The Bank Steps In
To understand why profit did not stay in cash, the customer side is only half the picture. Inventory rose by NIS 2.73 million to NIS 66.27 million. At the same time, suppliers and service providers fell by NIS 6.56 million to NIS 21.82 million. That is a material shift because it means the group held more stock while receiving less financing from suppliers.
This is exactly where the funding gap opened. If receivables, inventory, and suppliers are read together, net operating funding need rose to NIS 128.4 million from NIS 112.8 million a year earlier. That means Ralko needed another NIS 15.6 million to carry the same basic operating cycle. That is not a rounding issue. It is close to two thirds of annual net profit.
Suppliers still provide some room. Supplier credit is generally up to 90 days, and the average actual supplier period in 2025 was about 61 days. But the year-end balance says that this funding layer was thinner than in 2024. The bank ended up filling much more of the gap.
That chart makes the shift clear. Receivables and inventory moved up, suppliers moved down, and bank debt climbed from NIS 17.97 million to NIS 28.73 million. Even though discounted card slips declined slightly to NIS 54.41 million, that layer is still very large relative to the size of the company, and certainly relative to the cash left on the balance sheet.
And this is where the distinction matters. This is still not a covenant story. The company had non-committed bank lines of NIS 101.75 million, with actual utilization of NIS 36.06 million at year-end and NIS 46.99 million near the report date. In addition, at Ralko Consumer Products the ratio between short-term financial credit and net operating needs stood at only 26.8% versus a ceiling of 95%, and equity as a share of assets stood at 60% versus a 20% minimum.
That is the key difference. Ralko's problem is not that the banks are about to shut the tap. The problem is that the commercial model needs a wider tap just to keep looking normal.
Card-Slip Discounting And Dividends: Why The Cash Did Not Stay In The Business
Discounted card slips are the layer that gets missed if the reader looks only at bank debt on the balance sheet. At the end of 2025, the balance stood at NIS 54.41 million. That was slightly below the NIS 58.49 million seen a year earlier, but still large enough to show how much of the collection cycle is being sold to financial institutions in order to accelerate cash.
The cost is also visible. Discounting expenses on card slips and credit-card fees amounted to NIS 4.01 million in 2025. That is not a footnote. It is financing cost embedded in the operating model, on top of bank interest, and it shows that customer credit is no longer just a sales-policy issue. It is a standalone funding layer.
Once dividends are added, the gap becomes very sharp. Ralko paid NIS 30 million in 2025, in two tranches of NIS 15 million each. That is more than the year's net profit and more than operating cash flow. After the balance-sheet date, on March 25, 2026, another NIS 20 million cash dividend was approved.
This is the most important chart in the continuation. It shows that without the NIS 10.76 million increase in short-term bank debt, 2025 would not have ended with low cash. It would have ended with no real cushion at all. That is why the dividend is not just a capital-allocation preference. It is part of the reason the gap between profit and cash remained open.
From an earnings-quality perspective, that is the crucial point. Ralko was not distributing surplus cash. It was distributing cash in a year when surplus cash was very limited and the operating cycle still needed support from both the bank and discounting channels.
What Has To Change Next
If this gap is going to close, it will not be enough to look for revenue recovery alone. Four concrete changes matter.
- DSO needs to move back toward 2024 levels. Higher sales without better collections will only expand the financing need again.
- Supplier credit needs to stop shrinking, or inventory has to turn faster. Without one of those two changes, operating credit will continue to come from the bank.
- Discounted card slips and short-term bank debt need to fall relative to revenue. As long as both stay elevated, the company is effectively admitting that customer cash is still not arriving on time.
- Shareholder distributions need to line up with the cash left after the cycle, not just with accounting profit. Otherwise every good quarter will reopen with too little cushion.
There is also a real counter-thesis, and it deserves weight. Ralko still has wide covenant headroom, high equity as a share of assets, and a 26.8% short-term-credit-to-operating-needs ratio that is nowhere near the ceiling. If collections improve even modestly and suppliers provide slightly more room, the gap could close fairly quickly. So this is not a distress thesis. It is a cash-quality thesis.
Conclusions
The main article showed that financing became the real story at Ralko. This follow-up shows the mechanism: receivables expanded, inventory rose, supplier credit retreated, card-slip discounting remained a material funding layer, and dividends took more out of the system than the operating cycle released. Profit remained profit. Cash did not remain cash.
That is why the headline liquidity ratios are slightly misleading. They are not wrong, but they are beside the main point. The real question is not whether Ralko has enough current assets to look liquid. The real question is how quickly those assets can become cash without help from banks and financial intermediaries.
If 2026 brings better collections, stable supplier credit, and lower use of short-term funding, the gap between profit and cash can narrow quickly and 2025 will look more like an overloaded operating year than a warning year. If not, the number that continues to explain Ralko will not be net profit. It will be the price the company has to pay in order to turn that profit into money.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.