Strawberry Inc.: How Much of the AFFO Actually Reaches Common Shareholders
Strawberry's AFFO rose to $72.5 million, but that is still not a number that automatically belongs to common shareholders. In an UPREIT structure where the company owns only about 24% of the OP units, most of the economics still sit outside the public layer, and common equity remains very thin even after a better year.
Where The Main Article Stopped
The main article argued that in Strawberry it is not enough to look at AFFO, leverage ratios, or portfolio quality without asking what actually reaches the public common layer. This follow-up isolates exactly that gap: the path from the reported $72.5 million of adjusted AFFO to common-shareholder economics.
That matters because the headline metrics, AFFO, AEBITDA, and Net Debt to Net Assets, are measured at the real-estate and operating-partnership layer. But the 10-K itself makes clear that the public company owns only about 24.0% of the OP units at year-end 2025, while 76.0% of the units are held outside the company and participate pro rata in the partnership's cash distributions. A reader who treats the full $72.5 million as if it belongs to common shareholders is reading the structure upside down.
First point: the $72.5 million of AFFO is an OP-layer number, not a common-shareholder number.
Second point: the income statement says the same thing in GAAP terms. Out of $33.3 million of net income, only $7.6 million was attributable to common shareholders, while $25.7 million was allocated to non-controlling interest.
Third point: even after a better operating year, common stockholders' equity fell to only $12.1 million, from $18.2 million at the end of 2024. The public layer is not only thin, it did not rebuild in 2025.
The $72.5 Million AFFO Starts At The OP Layer, Not The Common Layer
The reconciliation page in the presentation shows adjusted AFFO of $72.5 million for 2025, up from $55.8 million in 2024. That is an important number, but it describes the economics of the platform before the bridge to common shareholders. The UPREIT note in the 10-K explains why: the company operates through that structure, owns about 24.0% of the OP units, and the holders outside the company own about 76.0% and are entitled to share in partnership cash distributions in proportion to their ownership.
If the year-end ownership split is applied to 2025 AFFO, the result is a rough analytical illustration of about $17.4 million for the public-company layer and about $55.1 million for the OP holders outside it. That is not a company-reported attributable AFFO measure. That is the point. Without a bridge like this, the reader can easily assign to common shareholders a number that begins in a far wider economic layer.
| Item | 2025 | What it actually measures |
|---|---|---|
| Reported adjusted AFFO | $72.5 million | An adjusted metric for the real-estate and OP layer |
| Company's OP ownership | About 24.0% | The public company's ownership in the operating layer |
| Ownership-based illustration of the public layer | About $17.4 million | A rough ownership bridge, not a reported metric |
| Net income attributable to common shareholders | $7.6 million | The accounting residual that reaches common |
| Dividends paid to common shareholders | $7.6 million | The actual cash distribution to the public layer |
That bridge improved only partially. In 2024 the company owned about 22.1% of the OP units, so the same type of illustration would have produced about $12.3 million against $55.8 million of AFFO. In 2025 the company's share rose to 24.0%, but that still leaves roughly three quarters of the OP economics outside the public company.
The Actual 2025 Split Already Shows Who Sits Above Whom
This message does not rely only on a theoretical ownership bridge. It already appears in the actual 2025 split. The UPREIT note says OP-unit holders participate in partnership cash distributions in proportion to ownership. The statement of equity shows that in 2025 the company paid $7.634 million of dividends to common shareholders, while $25.6 million was recorded as distributions to non-controlling interest.
In plain terms, when cash left the structure in 2025, about 77% went outside the company and only about 23% reached the public common layer. That is almost a one-for-one mirror of the 76% versus 24% ownership split. So the claim that the full AFFO somehow "belongs" to common shareholders simply does not fit the structure.
The same read comes from the accounting allocation. Out of $33.3 million of net income, $25.7 million was attributable to non-controlling interest and only $7.6 million to common shareholders. AFFO and net income are not the same measure, but the directional message is consistent: the operating layer is far broader than the layer that actually belongs to public common holders.
One more detail matters. The company increased its OP share in 2025 partly by issuing 1,056,200 common shares in exchange for OP units. In other words, the public-company share of the partnership did move up, but it moved up through expansion of the common-share layer. That can improve the bridge over time, but it also means the move from 22.1% to 24.0% did not come for free.
Why 49.5% Net Debt To Net Assets Is Not A Common-Equity Cushion
The presentation offers another number that is easy to read too flatly: Net Debt to Net Assets of 49.5%. Based on the reconciliation, that comes from total debt of $747.9 million, cash of $31.8 million, net debt of $716.1 million, and net assets of $1.448 billion. That is a legitimate ratio, but it measures a different layer from the one common shareholders actually own.
The consolidated balance sheet shows what remains after liabilities: total equity of $50.5 million. Of that, only $12.1 million belongs to common stockholders, while $38.4 million belongs to non-controlling interest.
That does not make the presentation's leverage math wrong. It simply means it is measuring a higher layer. At the property and partnership level, one can talk about $716.1 million of net debt against $1.448 billion of net assets. At the public common layer, the equity cushion is only $12.1 million. So the 49.5% ratio, by itself, does not describe the margin of safety available to common shareholders.
The point becomes sharper when the trend is added. Despite a stronger AFFO year, common stockholders' equity fell by 33.4% in 2025, from $18.2 million to $12.1 million. The statement of equity shows that the decline came mainly from foreign-currency translation losses recorded in other comprehensive income and from dividends, which more than offset the year's profit contribution. AFFO went up, but the common-equity layer actually became thinner.
What Has To Change For AFFO To Become More Relevant To The Public Layer
That leads directly to the practical conclusion. For AFFO to become a metric that speaks more cleanly to common shareholders, it is not enough for the headline number to keep rising. Three things have to happen at the same time.
First, the company's share of the OP units has to keep rising, either through more exchanges of OP units into common shares or through a reduction in the units held outside the company. Without that, most of the economics will continue to sit outside the public layer.
Second, more of the cash generated by the platform has to remain at the common-shareholder level. In 2025 the actual distributions preserved the same 76% versus 24% hierarchy, so even a better year did not change the fact that most of the distributable economics still flowed outward.
Third, common stockholders' equity has to start rebuilding instead of shrinking. As long as common equity remains around $12.1 million, common shareholders are leaning on a very narrow equity layer even while AFFO, AEBITDA, and the headline leverage ratios look materially stronger.
The Follow-Up Conclusion
The most important number here is not the $72.5 million of AFFO in isolation, but the scale of what remains after the structure is respected. A rough ownership bridge leaves about $17.4 million at the public-company layer. The accounting line leaves $7.6 million of net income attributable to common shareholders. The actual 2025 cash split leaves $7.6 million of common dividends against $25.6 million distributed outside the company. And the balance sheet leaves only $12.1 million of common equity.
The follow-up thesis is therefore straightforward: in Strawberry, AFFO is first an OP and property-layer metric, and only then a common-shareholder metric. As long as 76% of the units remain outside the company, and as long as the common-equity layer stays this thin, the right way to read the company has to pass through that bridge rather than stop at the AFFO headline.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.