Jungo: Why Roughly 1,000 Installations Still Haven't Become Meaningful Revenue
Jungo can already point to more than 30 historical paying CoDriver customers, POCs across tens of thousands of vehicles, and roughly 1,000 VuDrive installations by year-end 2025. But 2025 still ended with only $179 thousand of VuDrive and CoDriver revenue and no backlog, which means the bottleneck is no longer product interest. It is commercial conversion.
The main article argued that VuDrive is still Jungo's active bottleneck. This follow-up isolates the sharper question: how can a company point to more than 30 historical paying CoDriver customers, POCs across tens of thousands of vehicles, and roughly 1,000 VuDrive installations by the end of 2025, yet still finish the year with only $179 thousand of VuDrive and CoDriver revenue and no order backlog.
This is no longer a question of product awareness. It is a commercialization question. The filing describes a path in which technical proof did get built, but the jump from technical proof to broad recurring revenue still did not close.
The Commercialization Ladder Still Breaks In The Middle
| Stage | What was achieved | What is still missing |
|---|---|---|
| Early CoDriver phase | More than 30 customers paid for the product | Most of those engagements were internal development work and POCs, not a broad commercial program |
| Technical proof | CoDriver was installed in tens of thousands of vehicles during POCs | Those processes did not mature into production-scale orders |
| Some VuDrive deployment | Roughly 1,000 VuDrive installations were completed by year-end 2025 | The installation base still did not create a meaningful revenue layer |
| Financial signature | VuDrive and CoDriver produced $179 thousand in 2025 revenue | There is still no backlog, so there is no contracted forward visibility |
That table is the core of the story. Jungo is not in a place where there was no interest, no testing, and no customer contact. It is in a place where each step of the commercialization ladder worked only partially, and the link between the steps broke before a real revenue engine emerged.
CoDriver Proved Interest, Not A Business
The part that is easy to miss already appears in the business-description section. More than 30 customers paid for CoDriver across markets that included the United States, Germany, France, Japan, and China. At first glance, that reads like a global customer base. But the next lines matter more: those customers mainly bought CoDriver for internal development work and proof-of-concept testing.
That distinction is critical. A POC proves that a customer is willing to test the product inside its own operating environment. It does not yet prove that the product moved from evaluation into systematic commercial deployment. At Jungo the gap is explicit: CoDriver was installed in tens of thousands of vehicles in those POCs, but the processes did not mature, in part because the company did not always meet the prospective customer's technological requirements and in part because of other mismatches.
The sharper point is what happened next. The company does not frame this as a temporary delay. It says it stopped investing in those tenders because they were not necessarily economic and because competition was too hard. In other words, the historical base of more than 30 paying CoDriver customers should not be read as hidden backlog waiting to convert. It is mostly a history of product validation that did not close into scaled economics.
Even After The Pivot To VuDrive, Conversion Stayed Slow
After reaching that conclusion, Jungo shifted toward the Aftermarket through VuDrive, a fuller product that combines software, camera hardware, and a fleet-management cloud layer. Here too the filing shows that the company is not operating in a vacuum. It targets telematics providers, insurers, and large fleets. In March 2023 it also signed a cooperation agreement with an insurance agency focused on heavy commercial fleets in Israel, which according to the company insures roughly 30,000 vehicles.
And still, by the end of 2025, total VuDrive installations reached only roughly 1,000. That is a real installed base, but it also highlights the distance between channel access and actual rollout. If even after opening a relatively meaningful insurance channel, and after pivoting to a fuller product, the company ends 2025 with only about 1,000 installations, the problem is not just getting in front of the customer. The problem is building a repeatable commercial path that closes at a much wider pace.
Management's language around the U.S. market tells the same story. As of the report date, Jungo had received several VuDrive orders in the United States, but at levels it explicitly describes as still immaterial. At the same time, it says competition there intensified, it does not expect significant growth in America, and it is already reducing its marketing effort in that market. That is not the language of an engine beginning to scale. It is the language of a company still trying, but already moderating expectations.
The datapoint that closes the picture appears in the backlog section: there is no order backlog. So even after a sale-ready product, distribution channels, several U.S. orders, and roughly 1,000 cumulative installations, the company still does not present contractual forward visibility.
The Financial Statements Barely Show The Scale
Note 15 gives the hardest test because it strips the whole commercialization story down to the revenue line. In 2025 Jungo recorded only $179 thousand of VuDrive and CoDriver revenue, versus $182 thousand in 2024. So after another year of selling effort, installations, and channel work, this line not only failed to break out. It even slipped slightly.
This matters not only because of the total number, but also because of its internal composition. Out of that $179 thousand, only about $3 thousand came from VuDrive camera leasing revenue. So even the hardware layer, which was supposed to help make VuDrive a fuller solution, is still barely visible in the revenue line.
The fair counter-argument also deserves space. VuDrive is not structured as a large one-time sale. The software element is recognized over time, and the camera component is leased for one to four years. The filing also does not disclose when through the year those installations were completed. That means installations are not supposed to translate one for one into immediate annual revenue. But even after giving that model full credit, the result is still too small relative to the commercialization narrative. If roughly 1,000 installations and several U.S. orders still leave the product line at only $179 thousand a year, commercialization remains below the threshold of materiality.
The Second Half Still Does Not Show A Breakout Signature
The annual report does not provide a half-year split by product, so it cannot prove whether VuDrive improved specifically in the second half of 2025. But at the consolidated-company level there is still no clear commercialization breakout signature. Revenue fell in the second half to $1.055 million from $1.284 million in the first half, and operating loss remained above $1 million even in the second half.
Operating loss did improve slightly, but the second half also included $250 thousand of other income. So that modest improvement cannot be read as proof that VuDrive already started changing the economics of the business. At most, it suggests that if commercialization improved at all, it still was not large enough to leave a clear mark on the consolidated numbers.
What Management Is Already Signaling About VuDrive
This is where the immediate report from March 24, 2026 matters just as much as the annual numbers. The board does continue to speak about ongoing VuDrive marketing efforts, but in the same breath it emphasizes that the company reduced VuDrive development investment over the past year in a way that is expected to cut losses significantly already in 2026.
That is not the wording of a management team looking at a product that has already proven a strong commercial path and now just needs more acceleration. It is the wording of a management team trying to keep the option alive under capital discipline. That is also why it is not surprising that, in the same strategic discussion, the board is simultaneously examining a sale of part or all of the business and the development of other businesses. If VuDrive were already on a clear path to becoming a real engine, this would not be the framing.
Bottom Line
Jungo does not suffer from a lack of commercial interest signals. It suffers from a gap between interest signals and proven economics. More than 30 historical paying CoDriver customers, POCs across tens of thousands of vehicles, and roughly 1,000 VuDrive installations by the end of 2025 show that the product is not imaginary. But $179 thousand of VuDrive and CoDriver revenue with no backlog shows just as clearly that the product still has not become a meaningful business.
If the thesis has to be compressed into one sentence, it is simple: VuDrive has already proved it can get into the vehicle, but it still has not proved it can get into the revenue line at a scale that justifies the strategic story built around it.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.