Continuation to איידיאיי הנפקות: What Series ז' says about the group's new cost of capital
The main article argued that the 2025 refinancing removed the near-term wall. This follow-up isolates what Series ז' actually revealed: the group's Tier 2 funding cost has reset into a 5%-plus world, and Series ו' is now moving toward its first call window against that new hurdle.
What This Follow-Up Is Isolating
The main article argued that the 2025 refinancing removed the immediate repayment pressure. This follow-up isolates the question left behind by that move: not whether the group could refinance, but at what price it managed to do so, and what that price now implies for the next decision waiting inside Series ו'.
That matters because איידיאיי הנפקות is not judged through standalone earnings power. It is judged through the group's ability to keep a subordinated capital pipe open without each refinancing cycle repricing the layer sharply higher. 2025 gave a particularly clean read on that question: Series ז' was issued at a much higher coupon, Series ה' was redeemed in full, and Series ו' was left as the only remaining piece of older low-cost debt in the stack.
Three findings matter more than the headline. First: year-end tradable debt principal rose by only 5.2%, from NIS 480.0 million to NIS 505.0 million, but annual coupon run-rate rose by 51.4%, from NIS 13.9 million to NIS 21.1 million. Second: that jump happened without a visible downgrade and without a dramatic structural change in the instrument. Both Series ו' and Series ז' are A2-rated, unlinked, tradable, subordinated, and unsecured. Third: the first optional call window on Series ו' now sits in late 2026, so 2025 did not merely solve an old issue. It also set the price hurdle against which the next refinancing choice will be judged.
That chart is the core of the thesis. This is not mainly a debt-growth story. It is a debt-pricing story. On a year-end basis, the group barely increased the size of its tradable bond stack, but it did replace a large part of it with a much more expensive layer.
What Series ז' Really Says About the Cost of Capital
Series ה' carried a 3.27% nominal coupon on NIS 315.6 million of relevant principal at end-2024. Series ו' carried 2.18% on NIS 164.4 million. Then Series ז' arrived in September 2025 with a 5.13% nominal coupon on NIS 340.6 million. That is a 186-basis-point increase versus Series ה' and a 295-basis-point increase versus Series ו'. Looked at through the Tier 2 layer alone, the move from 2024 to 2025 looks less like routine refinancing and more like a full reset in the observable price of capital.
The key point is not just that the new coupon is higher. It is that the 2% to 3% world is no longer the relevant anchor for the group's Tier 2 funding cost. At end-2024, the weighted nominal coupon of Series ה' and Series ו' stood at 2.90%. At end-2025, after Series ז' entered and Series ה' disappeared, the weighted nominal coupon of Series ו' and Series ז' had already moved to 4.17%. The weighted effective rate moved from about 2.80% to 4.36%. That is too large a shift to dismiss as a mere maturity reshuffle.
There is another detail beneath the headline. Net proceeds from Series ז' were about NIS 337.7 million, while the early redemption of Series ה' cost about NIS 315.9 million including accrued interest. In other words, 2025 did not only replace an older layer with a more expensive one. It also left the group with a slightly larger amount of principal outstanding. That is part of the reason why principal barely moved while annual coupon burden jumped so sharply.
| Debt layer | Relevant comparison point | Principal | Nominal coupon | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series ה' | End-2024, before the refinancing | NIS 315.6 million | 3.27% | The old funding layer that was taken out in 2025 |
| Series ו' | End-2025, still outstanding | NIS 164.4 million | 2.18% | The remaining legacy low-cost layer |
| Series ז' | End-2025, new layer | NIS 340.6 million | 5.13% | The new market-clearing funding cost for this capital layer |
Why The Repricing Signal Is Cleaner Than It Looks
It would have been easy to explain the higher coupon through a downgrade, weaker security, or some major structural change in the instrument. That is not what the numbers show. In August 2025, Midroog maintained Aa3 for Direct Insurance's financial strength, maintained A2 on the subsidiary's subordinated notes, and in September 2025 reaffirmed that same A2 rating for the expected Series ז' issuance. In the same disclosure package, both Series ו' and Series ז' are described as Tier 2 instruments, unlinked, tradable, unsecured, and subject to optional call provisions.
That makes the economic signal unusually sharp. The market did not demand 5.13% because it suddenly discovered a completely different instrument. It demanded 5.13% for the same subordinated capital layer in a more expensive funding regime. For the group, that may be the single most important datapoint in the whole 2025 refinancing thread. There was no visible credit event, yet the price of money still moved materially higher.
Year-end fair values add another layer. Series ו' ended the year with a fair value of NIS 154.9 million against NIS 164.4 million of principal, or about 94.2 cents per shekel of par. Series ז' ended the year with a fair value of NIS 357.4 million against NIS 340.6 million of principal, or about 104.9 cents per shekel of par. The natural reading is that the 2.18% coupon on Series ו' already looks below current market yield levels, while Series ז' was issued much closer to the new market clearing price.
That is why it would be too generous to read the successful placement of Series ז' simply as proof that the group cleared the hurdle. It did clear the hurdle, but it cleared it at a new price, and that price is now the benchmark for every future refinancing discussion.
Why Series ו' Is Now The Next Real Decision
Series ו' was issued in December 2021. Under its terms, it can only be called after five years from issuance. That places the first call window in December 2026. Series ז', by contrast, was issued in September 2025 and its first call window is much further out, in September 2032. So 2025 did not end the cost-of-capital story. It pushed the focus forward and concentrated it inside Series ו'.
The key point is what happens if the company does not exercise the first optional call. The same debt terms state that in that case noteholders receive an added interest amount equal to 50% of the original credit spread set at issuance. The fully stepped-up coupon is not presented here as one ready-made number, because these pages do not disclose the original spread for each series in that format. But the directional conclusion is clear: leaving Series ו' outstanding beyond its first call is no longer a simple choice to keep cheap debt until 2031. It becomes a choice between an older series that will reprice upward and a new refinancing market that has already shown it wants something around 5% for this layer.
That is exactly why Series ז' matters well beyond the 2025 transaction itself. It did not only finance the redemption of Series ה'. It also set the comparison rate that will follow Series ו' into late 2026. If funding conditions improve by then, Series ז' may end up looking like a temporary high-water mark. If they do not, the market will increasingly treat Series ו' as cheap legacy paper that cannot be replaced without locking in a meaningfully higher coupon.
There is also a regulatory layer worth keeping in view. The proceeds of Series ז' were recognized as Tier 2 capital at Direct Insurance, and after the early redemption of Series ה' the insurer still remained above its required solvency capital. In other words, this was not growth capital. It was replacement capital. The group paid a new, higher funding price in order to preserve the subordinated capital layer and retire the old series without breaking the regulatory framework that sits above it.
Bottom Line
Series ז' says something simple and important about איידיאיי הנפקות: the group's new cost of capital for this debt layer no longer starts with a 2-handle or a 3-handle. It starts above 5%. 2025 did remove the immediate maturity pressure, but it did so at a price that resets the economics of future refinancing.
That leads directly to the next question. Not whether the group knows how to refinance, but whether it can reach the Series ו' call window in late 2026 without locking in a structurally higher cost of capital for years to come. If funding conditions improve, Series ז' may end up looking like an expensive but temporary bridge. If they do not, 2025 will be remembered as the year the group bought time while also admitting that the price of that time had risen materially.
Disclosure: Deep TASE analyses are general informational, research, and commentary content only. They do not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, a recommendation, or an offer to buy, sell, or hold any security, and are not tailored to any reader's personal circumstances.
The author, site owner, or related parties may hold, buy, sell, or otherwise trade securities or financial instruments related to the companies discussed, before or after publication, without prior notice and without any obligation to update the analysis. Publication of an analysis should not be read as a statement that any position does or does not exist.
The analysis may contain errors, omissions, or information that changes after publication. Readers should review official filings and primary sources before making decisions.